Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology

Double antibody radioimmunoassay for monitoring metastatic breast cancer

  • Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology
  • Published:
British Journal of Cancer Submit manuscript

Abstract

We previously reported the production of a panel of murine monoclonal antibodies which recognize glycoproteins abnormally expressed in human breast tumours. Using two of these antibodies, a double antibody radioimmunoassay was designed to quantify levels of these breast tumour marker glycoproteins in serum. Marker levels greater than 28 units were considered abnormal. Using this criterion, 63% and 75% of patients with breast cancer stages I and II, respectively, and 88% of those with metastatic disease were found to have elevated marker levels. Thirteen percent of patients with non-malignant breast disease also had elevated marker levels. Elevated marker levels were also detected in patients with non breast neoplasms. One hundred and eleven women with metastatic disease were followed. Eighty-two percent of those with progressive disease and 73% of those where disease regressed had 20% changes in marker levels. These changes in marker levels preceded by up to 6 months changes in disease state. From these results we conclude that this assay may be useful for monitoring the course of disease in breast cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schecter, R., Major, P., Kovac, P. et al. Double antibody radioimmunoassay for monitoring metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 58, 362–367 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1988.220

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1988.220

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation