Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology

Tumour DNA ploidy as an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer

  • Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology
  • Published:
British Journal of Cancer Submit manuscript

Abstract

We determined nuclear DNA content from 308 archival paraffin-embedded malignant breast tumours and evaluated the survival of the patients by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. The overall 8-year survival rate of stage I-III breast cancer patients was 74.3% in DNA-diploid and 51.2% in DNA-aneuploid tumours (P less than 0.0001). DNA ploidy had prognostic significance in both node-negative and node-positive breast cancer, primarily in cases with steroid receptor-positive tumours. In a Cox multivariate analysis DNA ploidy (P = 0.001), primary tumour size (P = 0.0007), nodal status (P = 0.04) and the content of progesterone receptors (P = 0.0008) emerged as significant independent prognostic factors, whereas oestrogen receptor status, age and menopausal status of the patients had no significant independent prognostic value. If the histological grade of ductal carcinomas was also included in the Cox model, both grade and DNA ploidy had independent prognostic effect. In conclusion, our results indicate that the analysis of DNA ploidy is a useful adjunct in the assessment of prognosis for breast cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kallioniemi, OP., Blanco, G., Alavaikko, M. et al. Tumour DNA ploidy as an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 56, 637–642 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1987.258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1987.258

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation