Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness—it's not where you think it is

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Genetics

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A new study indicates that closely related genes in yeast may be less redundant than expected. Instead, the stability of genetic networks—which buffers the deleterious effect of mutations—may be due to the actions of unrelated genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wagner, A. Nature Genet. 24, 355–361 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, V., Chou, K.N., Lashkari, D., Botstein, D. & Brown, P.O. Science 274, 2069– 2074 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Winzeler, E.A. et al. Science 285, 901–906 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mortimer, R.K. Genetics 61, 329–334 ( 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dujon, B. Trends Genet. 12, 263–270 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delneri, D., Gardner, D.C. & Oliver, S.G. Genetics 153, 1591– 1600 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K.H. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 548–554 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura, M. & Ohta, T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 2848–2852 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfe, K. Robustness—it's not where you think it is. Nat Genet 25, 3–4 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/75560

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/75560

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation