Skip to main content
Log in

Testing Bt refuge strategies in the field

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Theoretical expectations regarding the rate of Bt toxin resistance evolution in the presence or absence of a refuge when the transgenic plants produce a high dose of toxin that kills $99.9% of susceptible insects and 99% of heterozygotes.

References

  1. James, C. Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops. (ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.P.A. 1998. Scientific Advisory Panel, Subpanel on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) plant-pesticides and resistance management, February 9-10, 1998. Docket No. OPPTS-00231.

  3. ILSI. An evaluation of insect resistance management in field corn: a science-based framework for risk assessment and risk management . (ILSI International Life Sciences Institute, November 23, 1999).

  4. Rissler, J. and M. Mellon . Now or never:Serious new plans to save a natural pest control. (Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge MA., 1998).

  5. E.P.A. and U.S.D.A. 1999. E.P.A. and USDA position paper on insect resistance management in Bt crops. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides /otherdocs/bt_position_paper_618.htm

  6. Shelton et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 339–342 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, F. Testing Bt refuge strategies in the field. Nat Biotechnol 18, 266–267 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/73693

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/73693

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation