Skip to main content
Log in

Nutrition advice: The vitamin D-lemma

  • News Feature
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A vociferous debate about vitamin-D supplementation reveals the difficulty of distilling strong advice from weak evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Institute of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D (National Academies Press, 2010); available here.

  2. Holick, M. F. et al. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0385 (2011).

  3. Giovannucci, E., Liu, Y., Hollis, B. W. & Rimm, E. B. Arch. Int. Med. 168, 1174-1180 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Priemel, M. et al. J. Bone Min. Res. 25, 305-312 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A. et al. Br. Med. J. 339, b3692 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Broe, K. E. et al. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 55, 234-239 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Law, M., Withers, H., Morris, J. & Anderson, F. Age Ageing 35, 482-486 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanders, K. M. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 303, 1815-1822 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Amy Maxmen is a freelance writer in New York City.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Vitamin D gets a dosing down

Related external links

IOM report on Vitamin-D intake

The Endocrine Society

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maxmen, A. Nutrition advice: The vitamin D-lemma. Nature 475, 23–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/475023a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/475023a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation