Skip to main content
Log in

Peers nip misconduct in the bud

  • Opinion
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

An Opinion to this article was published on 21 July 2010

A new survey shows that informal intervention can often avert much irresponsible scientific behaviour, and is not as risky as people might fear, say Gerald Koocher and Patricia Keith-Spiegel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Acting on their suspicions

References

  1. Wenger, N. S., Korenman, S. G., Berk, R. & Liu, H. Evaluation Rev. 23, 553–570 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S. & Lewis, K. S. Am. Sci. 81, 542–554 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Office of Research Integrity. Questions and Answers: 42 CFR Part 93 (2006). Available at http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/QandA.reg.6-06.pdf

  4. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S. & de Vries, R. Nature 435, 737–738 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitley, B. E. & Keith-Spiegel, P. Academic Dishonesty: An Educator's Guide (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

See also Opinion, page 436 .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koocher, G., Keith-Spiegel, P. Peers nip misconduct in the bud. Nature 466, 438–440 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/466438a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466438a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation