Scientific performance indicators are proliferating — leading researchers to ask afresh what they are measuring and why. Richard Van Noorden surveys the rapidly evolving ecosystem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Garfield, E. & Sher, I. H. in Research Program Effectiveness (eds Yovits, M. C., Gilford, D. M., Wilcox, R.H., Staveley, E. & Lemer, H. D.) 135-146 (Gordon and Breach, 1966).
Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., Markines, B. & Vespignani, A. Phys. Rev. E 80, 056103 (2009).
Butler, D. Nature 458, 135 (2009).
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A. & Chute, R. PLoS ONE 4, e6022 (2009).
Nature 435, 1003-1004 (2005).
Additional information
See Editorial, page 845 , and metrics special at www.nature.com/metrics .
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
The MESUR project, tracking online usage data
Thomson Reuters metrics essays
'Publish or Perish': a software tool for calculating metrics from Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Noorden, R. Metrics: A profusion of measures. Nature 465, 864–866 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/465864a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/465864a
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Evaluation of a Scientific Productivity Model among World Highly Cited Authors: a Study Based on Experts’ Opinions
Journal of the Knowledge Economy (2023)
-
Ethical Orientation and Research Misconduct Among Business Researchers Under the Condition of Autonomy and Competition
Journal of Business Ethics (2023)
-
The transfer of heritage modelling from research to practice
Heritage Science (2022)
-
Publication outperformance among global South researchers: An analysis of individual-level and publication-level predictors of positive deviance
Scientometrics (2021)
-
Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?
Scientometrics (2021)