Skip to main content
Log in

Direct observation of d-orbital holes and Cu–Cu bonding in Cu2O

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

A striking feature of metal oxide chemistry is the unusual electronic and chemical behaviour of Cu(I) and Ag(I): a case in point is that detailed understanding of Cu–O bonding is essential to the theory of high-temperature copper oxide superconductors. Both cations are usually coordinated in a linear fashion to two oxygens, particularly for Cu(I). In many compounds, the Cu(I) and Ag(I) cations also adopt close-packed (and related) configurations with short metal–metal distances that are strongly suggestive of the occurrence of metal–metal bonding1,2 despite their formal nd10 configuration. Such observations have been explained3,4 by invoking the participation in bonding of electronic orbitals of higher principal quantum number—that is, (n + 1)s and (n + 1)p—accompanied by the creation of d-orbital holes on the metal ion. To test this hypothesis, we have used a recently developed method of quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction5 combined with X-ray diffraction to map the charge-density distribution in the simple oxide Cu2O, the results of which we then compare with electronic-structure calculations. We are able to image directly the d holes on the copper atoms, and also demonstrate the existence of Cu–Cu bonding in this compound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: The structure of Cu2O.
Figure 2: An example of electron diffraction structure factor measurement for Cu2O (200) and (400).
Figure 3: The experimental and theoretical difference maps between the static crystal charge density and superimposed spherical O2- and Cu+ ions.
Figure 4: Comparison between experimental and theoretical structure factors (F).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jansen,M. Homoatomic d10-d10 interactions: their effects on structure and chemical and physical properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn. Engl. 26, 1098–1110 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pyykkö,P. Strong closed-shell interactions in inorganic chemistry. Chem. Rev. 97, 597–636 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Orgel,L. E. Stereochemistry of metals of the B sub-group. Part I, ions with filled d-electron shells. J. Chem. Soc. 4186–4190 (1958).

  4. Merz,K. M. & Hoffman,R. d10-d10 interactions: multinuclear copper(I) complexes. Inorg. Chem. 27, 2120–2127 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zuo,J. M. Quantitative convergent beam electron diffraction. Mater. Trans. JIM 39, 938–946 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Keeffe,M. Madelung constants for the C3 and C9 structures. J. Chem. Phys. 38, 3035–3038 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coppens,P. X-ray Charge Densities and Chemical Bonding (Oxford, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koritsanszky,T. et al. Accurate experimental electronic properties of DL-proline monohydrate obtained within 1 day. Science 279, 356–358 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart,R. F. & Spackman,M. in Structure and Bonding in Crystals (eds O'Keeffe, M. & Navrotsky, A.) 279–298 (Academic, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smart,D. J. & Humphreys,C. J. The application of electron diffraction to determining bonding charge densities in crystals. Int. Phys. Conf. Ser. 52, 211–214 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Restori,R. & Schwarzenbach,D. Charge density in cuprite, Cu2O. Acta Crystallogr. B 42, 201–208 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirfel,A. & Eichhorn,K. Accurate structure analysis with synchrotron radiation, the electron density in Al2O3 and Cu2O. Acta Crystallogr. A 46, 271–284 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart,R. F. Electron population analysis with rigid pseudoatoms. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 565–574 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rez,D., Rez,P. & Grant,I. Dirac-Fock calculations of X-ray-scattering factors and contributions to the mean inner potential for electron-scattering. Acta Crystallogr. A 50, 481–497 (1994); correction 53, 522 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blaha,P., Schwarz,K. & Luitz,J. WIEN97 (Vienna Univ. of Technol., Vienna, 1997).

  16. Blaha,P., Schwarz,K., Sorantin,P. & Trickey,S. B. Full-potential, linearized augmented plane-wave programs for crystalline systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 59, 399–415 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marksteiner,P., Blaha,P. & Schwarz,K. Electronic structure and binding mechanism of Cu2O. Z. Phys. B 64, 119–127 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zuo,J. M., Blaha,P. & Schwarz,K. The theoretical charge density of silicon: experimental test of exchange and correlation potentials. J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 9, 7541–7561 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghijsen,J. et al. Electronic structure of Cu2O and CuO. Phys. Rev. B 38, 11322–11330 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Avilov for discussions, and D. Schwarzenbach for providing the X-ray data. This work was supported by the NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Zuo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuo, J., Kim, M., O'Keeffe, M. et al. Direct observation of d-orbital holes and Cu–Cu bonding in Cu2O. Nature 401, 49–52 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/43403

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/43403

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation