Skip to main content
Log in

Ant parasite queens revert to mating singly

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A parasitic ant has abandoned the multiple mating habit of the queens of its related host.

Abstract

Multiple mating (polyandry) is widespread among animal groups, particularly insects1. But the factors that maintain it and underlie its evolution are hard to verify because benefits and costs are not easily quantified and they tend to be similar in related species. Here we compare the mating strategies of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior and its recently derived social parasite Acromyrmex insinuator, which is also its closest relative2 (see Fig. 1). We find that although the host queens mate with up to a dozen different males, the social parasite mates only singly. This rapid and surprising reversion to single mating in a socially parasitic ant indicates that the costs of polyandry are probably specific to a free-living lifestyle.

D. R. NASH

Small worker ants cluster around the parasite queen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 2: The observed frequency distributions of patrilines (offspring sired by different males) of the social parasite Acromyrmex insinuator (n=13) and its host A. echinatior (n=10), as derived from genetic analysis of the progeny of single queens.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simmons, L. W. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sumner, S., Aanen, D. K., Delabie, J. & Boomsma, J. J. Insectes Soc. 51, 37–42 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crozier, R. H. & Fjerdingstad, E. J. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 38, 267–285 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Villesen, P., Murakami, T., Schultz, T. R. & Boomsma, J. J. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1541–1548 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sumner, S., Nash, D. R. & Boomsma, J. J. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1315–1322 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sumner, S., Hughes, W. O. H. & Boomsma, J. J. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54, 256–263 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bekkevold, D. & Boomsma, J. J. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 615–623 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen, J. S. & Boomsma, J. J. Mol. Ecol. 8, 577–587 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ortius-Lechner, D., Gertsch, P. J. & Boomsma, J. J. Mol. Ecol. 9, 114–116 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Villesen, P., Gertsch, P. J. & Boomsma, J. J. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2, 320–322 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chao, A. & Lee, S. M. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 210–217 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacobus J. Boomsma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sumner, S., Hughes, W., Pedersen, J. et al. Ant parasite queens revert to mating singly. Nature 428, 35–36 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/428035a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/428035a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation