Skip to main content
Log in

An economic case for basic research

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Contrary to the anecdotal evidence of the 1980s, basic research does confer a preferential economic advantage on countries that fund it. That is why the United States is likely to dominate vital markets well into the next century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bush, V. Science — The Endless Frontier (US National Science Foundation, Washington DC, 1945; reprinted 1960 and 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Mansfield, E. in Science and Technology Policy Year Book (American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arima, A. Promoting Scientific Creativity in Japan (Paper presented at the Conference on Nurturing Creativity in Research, Canberra, 26–28 November 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krugman, P. Foreign Affairs (November/December 1994).

  5. Landau, R. in Technology and Economics (National Academy of Engineering, Washington DC, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boskin, M. J. & Lau, L. J. in Technology and Economics (National Academy of Engineering, Washington DC, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wall Street Journal Sect. A, 6 (11 August 1995).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, E. An economic case for basic research. Nature 381, 187–188 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381187a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/381187a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation