Skip to main content
Log in

Limits to vertebrate locomotor energetics suggested by hummingbirds hovering in heliox

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

OXYGEN consumption1 and muscle power output2 of hovering hummingbirds are among the highest recorded for vertebrates. Maximum performance of hummingbirds thus approaches the upper limits of vertebrate aerobic locomotion3. Because air density is a major determinant of aerodynamic power requirements4, hovering flight performances5 can be manipulated non-invasively using nor-moxic gas mixtures of variable density6. Here we show that limits to the locomotor capacity of hovering ruby-throated hummingbirds are unequivocally indicated by aerodynamic failure at low densities less than half that of sea-level air. Hummingbirds demonstrate considerable power reserves, with muscle mass-specific power (assuming perfect elastic energy storage) averaging from 98 W kg-1 in normal air to a maximum value of 133 W kg-1 before aerodynamic failure. In contrast to such variable power expenditure, however, muscle efficiency remains approximately constant at 10%. Modulation of power output is attained primarily through variation in wing-stroke amplitude, with aerodynamic failure occurring near 180°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suarez, R. K. Experientia 48, 565–570 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wells, D. J. J. exp. Biol. 178, 39–57 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hochachka, P. W. Muscles as Molecular and Metabolic Machines (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norberg, U. M. Vertebrate Flight (Springer, New York, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Weis-Fogh, T. J. exp. Biol. 56, 79–104 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dudley, R. J. exp. Biol. 198, 1065–1070 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellington, C. P. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 145–181 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger, M. J. Ornithol. 115, 273–288 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wells, D. J. J. exp. Biol. 178, 59–70 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dial, K. P. & Biewener, A. A. J. exp. Biol. 176, 31–54 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stevenson, R. D. & Josephson, R. K. J. exp. Biol. 149, 61–78 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Josephson, R. K. A. Rev. Physiol. 55, 527–546 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suarez, R. K., Lighton, J. R. B., Brown, G. S. & Mathieu-Costello, O. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.SA 88, 4870–4873 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenewalt, C. H. Smithson. misc. Collns 144, 1–46 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brobeck, J. R. & DuBois, A. B. in Medical Physiology Vol. 2 (ed. Mountcastle, V. B.) 1351–1365 (Mosby, St Louis. MO, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suarez, R. K. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 9207–9210 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lasiewski, R. C. Physiol. Zool. 36, 122–140 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellington, C. P. J. exp. Biol. 115, 293–304 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chai, P., Dudley, R. Limits to vertebrate locomotor energetics suggested by hummingbirds hovering in heliox. Nature 377, 722–725 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377722a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/377722a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation