Skip to main content
Log in

Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

HOW does the human visual system 'bind' different fragments in the visual scene to create enduring representations of objects1–5? A visual illusion known as 'metacontrast'6–9 or backward masking provides compelling evidence that perception is not instantaneous and that it occurs sequentially in distinct stages. If a solid white target square is displayed for 50 ms in a tachistoscope, switched off, and followed by a 50 ms display of two flanking mask squares, remarkably, subjects report seeing only the two flanking squares: the first square is simply not 'seen'. By plotting the magnitude of masking as a function of the delay between the target and mask (the stimulus onset asynchrony), one can obtain a characteristic 'U'-shaped function7 with optimum masking occurring at about 50 ms, and no masking with synchronous target and mask presentations or at delays higher than 300 ms. The illusion is also highly sensitive to elementary stimulus dimensions such as colour, orientation and spatial frequency8, and it has been suggested10 that it is based on 'low level' autonomous visual mechanisms rather than cognitive processes. Here we describe a novel visual stimulus that demonstrates that metacontrast can be strongly modulated by 'top down' influences such as voluntary visual attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Treisman, A. Sci. Amer. 225, 114–126 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crick, F. H. C. & Koch, C. Sem. Neurosci. 2, 263–275 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gray, C. M. & Singer, W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 1698–1702 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Damasio, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Brandt, S. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. 55, 1039–1067 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkel, L. & Saida, P. Amer. Sci. 82, 224–237 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stigler, R. Pflügers Archiv. 134, 365–435 (1910).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman, D. Psychol. Bulletin 62, 404–425 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, M. C., Breitmeyer, B., Lovegrove, W. & Gutierrez, L. Vis. Res. 31, 2017–2023 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennett, D. Consciousness Explained (Little, Brown, Boston, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Breitmeyer, B. & Ganz, L. Vis. Res. 17, 861–865 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cobb, S., Ramachandran, V. S. & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 20, 1667 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Nature 304, 529–531 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Scient. Am. 254, 102–109 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavanagh, P. Science 257, 1563–1565 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Logotethis, N. & Schall, J. Science 245, 761–763 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. DiLollo, V., Bischof, W. F. & Dixon, P. Psychol. Sci. 4, 260–263 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramachandran, V., Cobb, S. Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking. Nature 373, 66–68 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/373066a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/373066a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation