Skip to main content
Log in

How convincing is DNA evidence?

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Although some of the initial controversy surrounding DNA profiling has been resolved, courts have been misled about the strength of DNA evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lander, E. Nature 339, 501–505 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewontin, R. C. & Hartl, D. L. Science 254, 1745 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts, L. Science 254, 1721–1723 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, C, Nature 355, 753–754 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts, L. Chance 5, 60–66 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. National Research Council DNA Technology in Forensic Science (National Academy, Washington, DC, 1992).

  7. Macllwain, C. Nature 367, 101 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koehler, J. J. Jurimetrics 34, 21–39 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, C. Nature 359, 349 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, W. C. Judicature 77, 57 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balding, D., Donnelly, P. How convincing is DNA evidence?. Nature 368, 285–286 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/368285a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/368285a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation