Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

SPECIFIC receptors for lutropin1,2 (luteinizing hormone; LH) and follitropin3,4 (follicle-stimulating hormone; FSH) mediate the actions of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and FSH5 on the gonads. Here we report that short independent sequences of the β-subunit enable hCG to distinguish between the receptors for FSH and LH. Residues between the 11lth and 12th cysteines restrict FSH receptor binding; residues between the 10th and 11th cysteines and, to a much lesser extent, residues carboxy-terminal to the 11th cysteine also affect LH receptor binding. CF101–109, an hCG analogue containing hFSHβ residues between the 11th and 12th cysteines, had high affinity for both LH and FSH receptors. Modifications to CF101-109 that reduce binding to either LH or FSH receptors yield gonadotropin analogues having differing ratios of LH:FSH activity. Ligand-binding specificity of the LH receptor is determined by residues encoded by parts of exons 2–4 and 7–9 which prevent hFSH binding but have little effect on hCG binding. FSH receptor specificity is controlled primarily by residues encoded by exons 5 and 6 that prevent hCG binding but have little effect on hFSH binding. These determinants can be interchanged to create receptor analogues that bind hCG and hFSH. Our observations support a model in which distinct negative determinants restrict ligand-receptor interaction. This explains co-evolution of binding specificity in families of homologous ligands and their receptors. Natural or designed manipulation of these determinants leads to the 'evolution' of new, specific protein-protein interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Segaloff, D. L., Sprengel, R., Nikolics, G. & Ascoli, M. Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 46, 261–301 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koo, Y. B., Ji, I., Slaughter, R. G. & Ji, T. H. Endocrinology 128, 2297–2308 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sprengel, R., Braun, T., Nikolics, K., Segaloff, D. L. & Seeburg, P. H. Molec. Endocr. 4, 525–530 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heckert, L. L., Daley, I. J. & Griswold, M. D. Molec. Endocr. 6, 70–80 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce, J. G. & Parsons, T. F. A. Rev. Biochem. 50, 465–495 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy, B. D. & Martinuk, S. D. Endocr. Rev. 12, 27–44 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun, T., Schofield, P. R. & Sprengel, R. EMBO J. 10, 1885–1890 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moyle, W. R., Bernard, M. P., Myers, R. V., Marko, O. M. & Strader, C. D. J. biol. Chem. 266, 10807–10812 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagayama, Y. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 902–905 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Licht, P. et al. Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 33, 169–248 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Noce, T. et al. J. molec. Endocr. 3, 129–137 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiddes, J. C. & Talmadge, K. Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 40, 43–78 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J. et al. J. biol. Chem. 267, 16283–16287 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vilcek, J. & Lee, R. H. J. biol. Chem. 266, 7313–7316 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bewley, T. A. & Li, C. H. Adv. Enzym. 42, 73 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. VanOstade, X. et al. Nature 361, 206–207 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell, R. K., Dean Emig, D. M. & Moyle, W. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 760–764 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moyle, W. R., Ehrlich, P. H. & Canfield, R. E. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 2245–2249 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernard, M. P., Myers, R. V. & Moyle, W. R. Molec. cell. Endocr. 71, R19–R23 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brooker, J., Harper, J. F., Terasaki, W. L. & Moylan, R. D. Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res. 10, 1–33 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Munson, P. J. & Rodbard, D. Analyt. Biochem. 107, 220–239 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie, Y.-B., Wang, H. & Segaloff, D. L. J. biol. Chem. 265, 21411–21414 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moyle, W. R. et al. J. biol. Chem. 265, 8511–8518 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K. & Pease, L. R. Gene 77, 51–59 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moyle, W., Campbell, R., Myers, R. et al. Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs. Nature 368, 251–255 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/368251a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/368251a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation