Abstract
LEKS, where males congregate to display and females attend only to mate, present one of the most remarkable outcomes of sexual selection1. It is a common but untested belief that females mate with the most vigorous males2. In leks of the black grouse Tetrao tetrix, males dominant in winter flocks were most successful in mating, as were males winning fights over female dummies placed at territory boundaries. Males tear feathers from each others' tail ornaments in combats, and attractive males always had undamaged tails. We report here that by choosing victorious males, females mate with males that are most likely to survive the following six months. There is a strong association between female preference and male viability which supports a basic assumption of the 'good gene' models (refs. 3–9) where choosy females benefit through better viability of their offspring. But females may also be choosing viable males for immediate benefits2,10, in particular if diseases can be transmitted during copulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradbury, J. W. & Gibson, R. M. in Mate Choice (ed. Bateson, P. P. G.) 109–138 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).
Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. Nature 350, 33–38 (1991).
Zahavi, A. J. theoret. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).
Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).
Pomiankowski, A. N. Oxford Surv. evol. Biol. 5, 136–184 (1988).
Grafen, A. J. theoret. Biol. 144, 473–516 (1990).
Grafen, A. J. theoret. Biol. 144, 517–546 (1990).
Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. & Nee, S. Evolution (in the press).
Møller, A. P. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B243, 145–148 (1991).
Reynolds, J. D. & Gross, M. R. Am. Nat. 136, 230–243 (1990).
Höglund, J., Alatalo, R. V. & Lundberg, A. Behaviour 114, 221–231 (1990).
Alatalo, R. V., Höglund, J., Lundberg, A. & Sutherland, W. J. Behav. Ecol. (in the press).
Koivisto, I. Finnish Game Res. 26, 1–60 (1965).
Kruijt, J. P. & de Vos, G. J. in Reproductive Success (ed. Clutton-Brock, T. H.) 279–290 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988).
Kruijt, J. P., de Vos, G. J., & Bossema, I. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 15, 399–423 (1972).
Angelstam, P. Ornis Scand. 15, 123–134 (1984).
Willebrand, T. thesis, Uppsala Univ. (1988).
Watt, W. B., Carter, P. A. & Donohue, K. Science 233, 1187–1190 (1986).
von Schantz, T. et al. Nature 337, 166–169 (1989).
von Schantz, T., Göransson, G., Fröberg, I., Helgee, A. & Witzell, H. Anim. Behav. 40, 89–104 (1990).
Partridge, L. Nature 283, 290–291 (1980).
Taylor, C. E., Pereda, A. D. & Ferrari, J. A. Am. Nat. 129, 721–729 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alatalo, R., Höglund, J. & Lundberg, A. Lekking in the black grouse— a test of male viability. Nature 352, 155–156 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/352155a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/352155a0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Stabilising selection on immune response in male black grouse Lyrurus tetrix
Oecologia (2018)
-
Viability selection creates negative heterozygosity–fitness correlations in female Black Grouse Lyrurus tetrix
Journal of Ornithology (2018)
-
No behavioural response to kin competition in a lekking species
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2016)
-
Whole genome sequencing of the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix): reference guided assembly suggests faster-Z and MHC evolution
BMC Genomics (2014)
-
Physiological costs enforce the honesty of lek display in the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix)
Oecologia (2013)