Abstract
The early notion that cancer is caused by mutations in genes critical for the control of cell growth implied that genome stability is important for preventing oncogenesis. During the past decade, knowledge about the mechanisms by which genes erode and the molecular machinery designed to counteract this time-dependent genetic degeneration has increased markedly. At the same time, it has become apparent that inherited or acquired deficiencies in genome maintenance systems contribute significantly to the onset of cancer. This review summarizes the main DNA caretaking systems and their impact on genome stability and carcinogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loeb, L. A. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 51, 3075–3079 (1991).
Cadet, J., Berger, M., Douki, T. & Ravanat, J. L. Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement, and biological significance. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 131, 1–87 (1997).
Finkel, T. & Holbrook, N. J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408, 239–247 (2000).
Lindahl, T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362, 709–715 (1993).
Yamaizumi, M. & Sugano, T. UV-induced nuclear accumulation of p53 is evoked through DNA damage of actively transcribed genes independent of the cell cycle. Oncogene 9, 2775–2784 (1994).
Goodman, M. F. & Tippin, B. Sloppier copier DNA polymerases involved in genome repair. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 162–168 (2000).
Kunkel, T. A. & Bebenek, K. DNA replication fidelity. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 497–529 (2000).
Lawrence, C. The Rad6 DNA repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: what does it do and how does it do it? BioEssays 16, 253–258 (1994).
Masutani, C. et al. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η. Nature 399, 700–704 (1999).
Johnson, R. E., Kondratick, C. M., Prakash, S. & Prakash, L. hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science 285, 263–265 (1999).
Zhou, B. B. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408, 433–439 (2000).
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C. & Siede, W. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis (ASM Press, Washington DC, 1995).
Lindahl, T. & Wood, R. D. Quality control by DNA repair. Science 286, 1897–1905 (1999).
Takata, M. et al. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17, 5497–5508 (1998).
Tornaletti, S. & Hanawalt, P. C. Effect of DNA lesions on transcription elongation. Biochimie 81, 139–148 (1999).
de Laat, W. L., Jaspers, N. G. & Hoeijmakers, J. H. Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev. 13, 768–785 (1999).
Batty, D. P. & Wood, R. D. Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA. Gene 241, 193–204 (2000).
Bootsma, D., Kraemer, K. H., Cleaver, J. & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. in The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease Vol. 1 (eds Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S. & Valle, D.) 677–703 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001).
Lehmann, A. R. The xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) gene: one gene, two functions, three diseases. Genes Dev. 15, 15–23 (2001).
Vermeulen, W. et al. A temperature-sensitive disorder in basal transcription and DNA repair in humans. Nature Genet. 27, 299–303 (2001).
de Boer, J. & Hoeijmakers, J. H. Cancer from the outside, aging from the inside: mouse models to study the consequences of defective nucleotide excision repair. Biochimie 81, 127–137 (1999).
Wyatt, M. D., Allan, J. M., Lau, A. Y., Ellenberger, T. E. & Samson, L. D. 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylases: structure, function, and biological importance. BioEssays 21, 668–676 (1999).
Mol, C. D., Parikh, S. S., Putnam, C. D., Lo, T. P. & Tainer, J. A. DNA repair mechanisms for the recognition and removal of damaged DNA bases. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28, 101–128 (1999).
Bruner, S. D., Norman, D. P. & Verdine, G. L. Structural basis for recognition and repair of the endogenous mutagen 8-oxoguanine in DNA. Nature 403, 859–866 (2000).
Wilson, D. M. & Thompson, L. H. Life without DNA repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12754–12757 (1997).
Divine, K. K. et al. The XRCC1 399 glutamine allele is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the lung. Mutat. Res. 461, 273–278 (2001).
Khanna, K. K. & Jackson, S. P. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nature Genet. 27, 247–254 (2001).
Rotman, G. & Shiloh, Y. ATM: from gene to function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1555–1563 (1998).
Paull, T. T. et al. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10, 886–895 (2000).
Petrini, J. H. The Mre11 complex and ATM: collaborating to navigate S phase. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 293–296 (2000).
Digweed, M., Reis, A. & Sperling, K. Nijmegen breakage syndrome: consequences of defective DNA double strand break repair. BioEssays 21, 649–656 (1999).
Riballo, E. et al. Identification of a defect in DNA ligase IV in a radiosensitive leukaemia patient. Curr. Biol. 9, 699–702 (1999).
Van Gent, D. C., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. & Kanaar, R. Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 196–206 (2001).
Gurley, K. E. & Kemp, C. J. Synthetic lethality between mutation in Atm and DNA-PKcs during murine embryogenesis. Curr. Biol. 11, 191–194 (2001).
Jasin, M. Chromosome breaks and genomic instability. Cancer Invest. 18, 78–86 (2000).
Scully, R. & Livingston, D. M. In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nature 408, 429–432 (2000).
Moynahan, M. E., Pierce, A. J. & Jasin, M. BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol. Cell 7, 263–272 (2001).
Gao, Y. et al. Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development. Nature 404, 897–900 (2000).
Jiricny, J. Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome. EMBO J. 17, 6427–6436 (1998).
Jiricny, J. & Nystrom-Lahti, M. Mismatch repair defects in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 157–161 (2000).
Heyer, J., Yang, K., Lipkin, M., Edelmann, W. & Kucherlapati, R. Mouse models for colorectal cancer. Oncogene 18, 5325–5333 (1999).
McEachern, M. J., Krauskopf, A. & Blackburn, E. H. Telomeres and their control. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 331–358 (2000).
Shay, J. W. & Bacchetti, S. A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 33, 787–791 (1997).
Counter, C. M. et al. Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity. EMBO J. 11, 1921–1929 (1992).
Greider, C. W. Telomerase activity, cell proliferation, and cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 90–92 (1998).
Tang, R., Cheng, A. J., Wang, J. Y. & Wang, T. C. Close correlation between telomerase expression and adenomatous polyp progression in multistep colorectal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 58, 4052–4054 (1998).
Gonzalez-Suarez, E., Samper, E., Flores, J. M. & Blasco, M. A. Telomerase-deficient mice with short telomeres are resistant to skin tumorigenesis. Nature Genet. 26, 114–117 (2000).
DePinho, R. A. The age of cancer. Nature 408, 248–254 (2000).
de Lange, T. & Jacks, T. For better or worse? Telomerase inhibition and cancer. Cell 98, 273–275 (1999).
Bryan, T. M., Englezou, A., Dalla-Pozza, L., Dunham, M. A. & Reddel, R. R. Evidence for an alternative mechanism for maintaining telomere length in human tumors and tumor-derived cell lines. Nature Med. 3, 1271–1274 (1997).
Rudolph, K. L. et al. Longevity, stress response, and cancer in aging telomerase-deficient mice. Cell 96, 701–712 (1999).
Jones, P. A. & Laird, P. W. Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nature Genet. 21, 163–167 (1999).
Sugasawa, K. et al. A multistep damage recognition mechanism for global genomic nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev. 15, 507–521 (2001).
Tang, J. Y., Hwang, B. J., Ford, J. M., Hanawalt, P. C. & Chu, G. Xeroderma pigmentosum p48 gene enhances global genomic repair and suppresses UV-induced mutagenesis. Mol. Cell 5, 737–744 (2000).
Le Page, F. et al. Transcription-coupled repair of 8-oxoguanine: requirement for XPG, TFIIH, and CSB and implications for Cockayne syndrome. Cell 101, 159–171 (2000).
Buschta-Hedayat, N., Buterin, T., Hess, M. T., Missura, M. & Naegeli, H. Recognition of nonhybridizing base pairs during nucleotide excision repair of DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6090–6095 (1999).
Sugasawa, K. et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex is the initiator of global genome nucleotide excision repair. Mol. Cell 2, 223–232 (1998).
Houtsmuller, A. B. et al. Action of DNA repair endonuclease ERCC1/XPF in living cells. Science 284, 958–961 (1999).
Whitehouse, C. J. et al. XRCC1 stimulates human polynucleotide kinase activity at damaged DNA termini and accelerates DNA single-strand break repair. Cell 104, 107–117 (2001).
Haber, J. E. Partners and pathways repairing a double-strand break. Trends Genet. 16, 259–264 (2000).
Davies, A. A. et al. Role of BRCA2 in control of RAD51 recombination and DNA repair protein. Mol. Cell 7, 273–282 (2001).
Hsu, H. L. et al. Ku acts in a unique way at the mammalian telomere to prevent end joining. Genes Dev. 14, 2807–2812 (2000).
Kolodner, R. D. & Marsischky, G. T. Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 89–96 (1999).
Harfe, B. D. & Jinks-Robertson, S. DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 359–399 (2000).
Obmolova, G., Ban, C., Hsieh, P. & Yang, W. Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA. Nature 407, 703–710 (2000).
Lamers, M. H. et al. The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G·T mismatch. Nature 407, 711–717 (2000).
Karran, P. & Bignami, M. DNA damage tolerance, mismatch repair and genome instability. BioEssays 16, 833–839 (1994).
Acknowledgements
I apologize to my colleagues for being able to cite only recent original papers and for the use of reviews for earlier relevant work, owing to space and reference limitations. I thank L. Niedernhofer for valuable help with the manuscript. J.H.J.H. is supported by the Dutch Cancer Society, the Dutch Science Organization (medical and chemical divisions), the EC, NIH and IACR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoeijmakers, J. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411, 366–374 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35077232
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35077232
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Detection of ribonucleotides embedded in DNA by Nanopore sequencing
Communications Biology (2024)
-
In Vitro Effects of Zirconia Nanoparticles: Uptake, Genotoxicity, and Mutagenicity in V-79 cells
Biological Trace Element Research (2024)
-
Oxidatively-induced DNA base damage and base excision repair abnormalities in siblings of individuals with bipolar disorder DNA damage and repair in bipolar disorder
Translational Psychiatry (2024)
-
Quantification of venadaparib, a novel PARP inhibitor, in the rat and dog plasma using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry
Journal of Analytical Science and Technology (2023)
-
Cysteine depletion sensitizes prostate cancer cells to agents that enhance DNA damage and to immune checkpoint inhibition
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2023)