Skip to main content
Log in

Pushing the limits of lithography

  • Review Article
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The phenomenal rate of increase in the integration density of silicon chips has been sustained in large part by advances in optical lithography — the process that patterns and guides the fabrication of the component semiconductor devices and circuitry. Although the introduction of shorter-wavelength light sources and resolution-enhancement techniques should help maintain the current rate of device miniaturization for several more years, a point will be reached where optical lithography can no longer attain the required feature sizes. Several alternative lithographic techniques under development have the capability to overcome these resolution limits but, at present, no obvious successor to optical lithography has emerged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Technological trends in lithography.
Figure 2: Comparison of trends in the wavelength of exposure light and the minimum feature size of LSI devices.
Figure 3: Schematic view of a typical exposure optical system.
Figure 4: Grating pattern image formation using resolution enhancement.
Figure 5: An example of resolution enhancement using phase-shifting technology.
Figure 6: Resist patterns delineated by the cell-projection system.
Figure 7

(Courtesy of NTT-AT.)

Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ed. International SEMATECH) 〈http://www.itrs.net/ntrs/publntrs.nsf 〉 (1999).

  2. Klein, M. V. Optics (Wiley, New York, 1970).

  3. Okazaki, S. Resolution limits of optical lithography. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 2829–2833 ( 1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levenson, M. D. et al. Improving resolution in photolithography with a phase-shifting mask. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 29, 1828 –1836 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Terasawa, T. et al. 0.3 μm optical lithography using a phase shifting mask . Proc. SPIE 1088, 25–33 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsuo, K. et al. High resolution optical lithography system using oblique incidence illumination. Technol. Digest IEDM 91, 70 –972 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nakayama, Y. et al. Electron-beam cell projection lithography: a new high throughput electron direct-writing technology using a tailored Si aperture. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 1836 ( 1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger, S. D. et al. Projection electron beam lithography: a new approach. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 2996–2999 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfeiffer, H. C. & Stickel, W. PRIVAIL—an E-beam stepper with variable axis immersion lenses. Microelectron. Eng. 27, 143–146 ( 1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deguchi, K. et al. Pattering characteristics of a chemically-amplified negative resist in synchrotron radiation lithography. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 2954–2958 ( 1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinoshita, H. et al. Soft X-ray reduction lithography using multilayer mirrors . J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 1648– 1651 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bjorkholm, J. E. et al. Reduction imaging at 14 nm using multilayer-coated optics: printing of features smaller than 0.1 μm. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 1509 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oizumi, H. et al. Sub-50 nm patterning in EUV lithography. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (in the press).

  14. Kubiak, G. D. et al. High power extreme-ultraviolet source based on gas jets. Proc. SPIE 3331, 81–89 ( 1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Silfvast, W. T. et al. High power plasma discharge source at 13.5 nm and 11.4 nm for EUV lithography. Proc. SPIE 3676, 272 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A part of this work is supported by New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, T., Okazaki, S. Pushing the limits of lithography. Nature 406, 1027–1031 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35023233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35023233

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation