Skip to main content
Log in

Uncoupling of the synthesis of edited and unedited COIII RNA in Trypanosoma brucei

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

RNA EDITING, a novel and unexpected type of information processing, was first demonstrated in the kinetoplasts of certain protozoans1–12. It is a remarkable phenomenon: certain species of messenger RNA have nucleotide sequences that differ greatly from the sequences of the genes from which they are presumably transcribed. The differences are usually due to addition of uridylate residues, but occasionally also to their deletion. The most spectacular case of editing known occurs in the mRNA of the mitochon-drial gene for subunit III of cytochrome oxidase (COIII) in Trypanosoma brucei. This mRNA is twice the length of its gene owing to the addition of several hundred uridylate residues and a few deletions, spread over the entire length of the RNA molecule13. Whereas unedited RNA molecules, the nucleotide sequences of which correspond to the genomic sequence, have been isolated13–16, no DNA template corresponding to the edited RNA sequence has been detected in either the mitochondrial or nuclear genome. It was suggested, therefore, that unedited mRNAs are transcribed from mitochondrial DNA and then edited post-transcriptionally by endonucleolytic cleavage of the primary transcript at specific sites, followed by insertion or deletion of uridylate residues and religation13. We have now examined the general nature of the RNA editing process to determine whether it involves the insertion of nucleotide residues into pre-existing molecules or the continuous de novo synthesis of edited mRNA. The results of our experiments rule out an insertion mechanism and strongly indicate that edited mRNA is synthesized as a unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisen, H. Cell 53, 331–332 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maizels, N. & Weiner, A. Nature 334, 469–470 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamond, A. Trends Biol. Sci. 13, 283–284 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson, L. & Shaw, J. Cell 57, 355–366 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benne, R. Biochim. biophys. Acta 1007, 131–139 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stuart, R. Parasitol. Today 5, 5–8 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Benne, R. et al. Cell 46, 819–826 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feagin, J. E., Jasmer, D. P. & Stuart, K. Cell 49, 337–345 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feagin, J. E. & Stuart, K. Molec. cell. Biol. 8, 1259–1265 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feagin, J. E., Shaw, J. M., Simpson, L. & Stuart, K. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 539–543 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw, J. M., Feagin, J. E., Stuart, K. & Simpson, L. Cell 53, 401–411 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Spek, H. et al. EMB0 J. 7, 2509–2514 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Feagin, J. E., Abraham, J. M. & Stuart, K. Cell 53, 413–422 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Benne, R., De Vries, B. F., Van den Burg, J. & Klaver, B. Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 6925–6941 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hensgens, L. A. M. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 7327–7344 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feagin, J. E., Jasmer, D. P. & Stuart, K. Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 4577–4596 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Abraham, J. M., Feagin, J. E. & Stuart, K. Cell 55, 267–272 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Volloch, V., Schweitzer, B. & Rits, S. Expl Cell. Res. 173, 38–48 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F. & Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Volckaert, G. & Fiers, W. Analyt. Biochem. 83, 222–227 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volloch, V., Schweitzer, B. & Rits, S. Uncoupling of the synthesis of edited and unedited COIII RNA in Trypanosoma brucei. Nature 343, 482–484 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/343482a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/343482a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation