Skip to main content
Log in

Worker policing in the honeybee

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IN most species of social Hymenoptera with queen–worker dimorphism, workers cannot mate but retain functional ovaries1; because males arise from unfertilized haploid eggs, workers can potentially produce males. Worker-derived males are frequent in some species, but in others occur only in queenless colonies2,3. Workers are more related to their own sons (coefficient of 0.5) than to the queen's sons (their brothers; 0.25); they are also more related to nephews (0.375) than brothers if queens mate with one male, but if queens mate with more than two unrelated males a worker's mean rela tedness to nephews is less than to brothers3–5. In this case workers could benefit by 'worker policing'3,5: prevent-ing each other from producing males, perhaps by destroying worker-laid eggs or by aggression toward reproductive workers. Worker reproduction is rare in queenright colonies of species with multiply mated queens (such as honeybees6 and some yellowjacket wasps7), but is common in some monandrous species (bumblebees and stingless bees3). Here we describe experiments showing strong discrimination by honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers against worker-laid male eggs, supporting the worker-policing hypothesis. The honeybee was studied because queens mate with 10–20 males8, making worker policing seem likely as a cause for the rarity of worker-derived males (about one in a thousand males is worker-derived6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oster, G. F. & Wilson, E. O. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. (Princeton University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourke, A. F. G. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 291–311 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratnieks, F. L. W. Am. Nat. 132, 217–236 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton, W. D. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 193–232 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Starr, C. K. 1984 in Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. (ed. Smith, R. L.) 428–459 (Academic, Orlando, Florida, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Visscher, P. K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 247–254 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross, K. G. Nature 323, 798–800 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Page, R. E. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 31, 297–320 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taber, S. J. Econ. Entomol. 54, 247–250 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Visscher, P. K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 453–460 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Page, R. E. & Erickson, E. H. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 117–126 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laidlaw, H. H. Contemporary Queen Rearing (Dadant. Hamilton, Illinois, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ratnieks, F. L. W. thesis, Cornell Univ. (1989).

  14. Lloyd, J. E. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 28, 131–160 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. Science 191, 249–263 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ratnieks, F., Visscher, P. Worker policing in the honeybee. Nature 342, 796–797 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/342796a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/342796a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation