Skip to main content
Log in

Earthquake recurrence and risk assessment in circum-Pacific seismic gaps

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE development of the concept of seismic gaps, regions of low earthquake activity where large events are expected, has been one of the notable achievements of seismology and plate tectonics. Its application to long-term earthquake hazard assessment continues to be an active field of seismological research. Here I have surveyed well documented case histories of repeated rupture of the same segment of circum-Pacific plate boundary and characterized their general features. I find that variability in fault slip and spatial extent of great earthquakes rupturing the same plate boundary segment is typical rather than exceptional but sequences of major events fill identified seismic gaps with remarkable order. Earthquakes are concentrated late in the seismic cycle and occur with increasing size and magnitude. Furthermore, earthquake rup-ture starts near zones of concentrated moment release, suggesting that high-slip regions control the timing of recurrent events. The absence of major earthquakes early in the seismic cycle indicates a more complex behaviour for lower-slip regions, which may explain the observed cycle-to-cycle diversity of gap-filling sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fedotov, S. A. Trans. Inst. Fiz. Zemli Akad. Nauk SSSR 36, 66–93 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mogi, K. Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ. 46, 175–203 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. McCann, W. R., Nishenko, S. P., Sykes, L. R. & Krause, J. Pure appl. Geophys. 17, 1082–1147 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sykes, L. R. J. geophys. Res. 76, 8021–8041 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelleher, J. J. geophys. Res. 77, 2087–2103 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelleher, J., Sykes, L. R. & Oliver, J. J. geophys. Res. 78, 2547–2585 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishenko, S. P. Reinholt Encylopaedia of Geophysics 260–268 (Van Nostrand, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nishenko, S. P. J. geophys. Res. 90, 3589–3615 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindh, A. G. U.S. geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 83-63, 1–15 (1983).

  10. Sykes, L. R. & Nishenko, S. P. J. geophys. Res. 89, 5905–5927 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nishenko, S. P. & Singh, S. K. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 77, 2095–2114 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Working Group on California Earthquakes Probabilities U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 88–387 (1988).

  13. Nishenko, S. P. & Jacob, K. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

  14. Abe, K. J. Phys. Earth. Suppl. 25, 261–271 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanamori, H. & McNally, K. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1241–1254 (1982).

  16. Beck, S. L. & Ruff, L. J. J. geophys. Res. 92, 14,123–14,138 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beck, S. L. & Ruff, L. J. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. (in the press).

  18. Jacoby, G. Sheppard, P. & Sieh, K. Science 241, 196–199 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sieh, K., Stuiver, M. & Brillinger, D. J. geophys. Res. 94, 603–623 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shimazaki, K. & Nakata, T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 279–282 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sykes, L. R. & Quittmeyer, R. C. in Earthquake Prediction, An International Review vol. 4 (eds Simpson, D. W. & Richards, P. G.) 217–247 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ando, M. Tectonophysics 27, 119–140 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsuda, T., Ota, Y., Ando, M. & Yonekura, N. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 89, 1610–1618 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Engdahl, E. R., Kisslinger, C. & Billington, S. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

  25. McCann, W. R., Perez, O. J. & Sykes, L. R. Science 207, 1309–1314 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Astiz, L., Kanamori, H. & Eissler, H. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 77, 1326–1346 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ishibashi, K. in Earthquake Prediction, An International Review vol. 4 (eds Simpson, D. W. & Richards, P. G.) 297–332 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sieh, K. E. in Earthquake Prediction, An International Review vol. 4 (eds Simpson, D. W. & Richards, P. G.) 181–208 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sykes, L. R., Kisslinger, J. B., House, L., Davies, J. N. & Jacob, K. H. Science 210, 1343–1345 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nishenko, S. P. & Buland, R. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 77, 1382–1399 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reid, H. F. The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906, Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission vol. 2, 16–28 (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC, 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beck, S. L. & Ruff, L. J. J. geophys. Res. 89, 9281–9291 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Choy, G. L. & Dewey, J. W. J. geophys. Res. 93, 1103–1118 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kikuchi, M. & Fukao, Y. Tectonophysics, 144, 231–247 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Houston, H. thesis, California Inst. Technol. (1986).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thatcher, W. Earthquake recurrence and risk assessment in circum-Pacific seismic gaps. Nature 341, 432–434 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/341432a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/341432a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation