Skip to main content
Log in

Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Acoustic stimuli are processed throughout the auditory projection pathway, including the neocortex, by neurons that are aggregated into ‘tonotopic’ maps according to their specific frequency tunings1,2,3. Research on animals has shown that tonotopic representations are not statically fixed in the adult organism but can reorganize after damage to the cochlea4 or after training the intact subject to discriminate between auditory stimuli5. Here we used functional magnetic source imaging (single dipole model) to measure cortical representations in highly skilled musicians. Dipole moments for piano tones, but not for pure tones of similar fundamental frequency (matched in loudness), were found to be enlarged by about 25% in musicians compared with control subjects who had never played an instrument. Enlargement was correlated with the age at which musicians began to practise and did not differ between musicians with absolute or relative pitch. These results, when interpreted with evidence for modified somatosensory representations of the fingering digits in skilled violinists6, suggest that use-dependent functional reorganization extends across the sensory cortices to reflect the pattern of sensory input processed by the subject during development of musical skill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Cortical stimulation by pure and piano tones in musicians and non-musicians.
Figure 2: Strength of cortical activation is higher in response to piano, rather than pure, tones and in musicians who began practising before age 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merzenich, M. M., Knight, P. L. & Roth, G. L. Cochleotopic organization of primary auditory cortex in the cat. Brain Res. 63, 343–346 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Merzenich, M. M., Kaas, J. H. & Roth, G. L. Comparison of tonotopic maps in animals. J. Comp. Neurol. 166, 387–402 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rauschecker, J. P., Tian, B. & Hauser, M. Processing of complex sounds in the macaque nonprimary auditory cortex. Science 268, 111–114 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Irvine, D. R. F. & Rajan, R. Advances in Hearing Research (eds Manley, G. A., Klump, G. M., Kappl, C., Fastl, M. & Oeckinghaus, H.) 3–23 (World Sci Publ Co, Singapore, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Recanzone, G. H., Schreiner, C. E. & Merzenich, M. M. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13, 87–103 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B. & Taub, E. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 270, 305–307 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pantev, C. et al. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69, 160–170 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Huang, Y. & Steinmetz, H. In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians. Science 267, 699–701 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yakovlev, P. I. & Lecours, A. in Regional Development of the Brain in Early Life (ed. Minkowski, A.) 3–70 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takeuchi, A. H. & Hulse, S. H. Absolute pitch. Psychol. Bull. 113, 345–361 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnea, A., Granot, R. & Pratt, H. Absolute pitch-electrophysiological evidence. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 16, 29–38 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benguerel, A. P. & Westdal, C. Absolute pitch and the perception of sequential music intervals. Music Percept. 9, 105–120 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williamson, S. J. & Kaufman, L. in Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials (eds Grandori, F., Hoke, M. & Romani, G. L.) 1–39 (Karger, Basel, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaas, J. H., Merzenich, M. M. & Killackey, H. P. The reorganization of somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing mammals. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 325–356 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our subjects for their cooperation, K. Berning for assistance and A.Wollbrink for engineering. This research was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and NATO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christo Pantev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pantev, C., Oostenveld, R., Engelien, A. et al. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 392, 811–814 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/33918

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/33918

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation