A dispute over the attribution of priority for a neo-lamarckian mechanism is premature and unseemly, to say the least, and may help make science seem ridiculous.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamarck, Dr Steele and plagiarism. Nature 337, 101–102 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/337101a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/337101a0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Mutations and plagiarisms
Nature (1989)
-
Heliocentric tangents
Nature (1989)