Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lamarck, Dr Steele and plagiarism

  • Opinion
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A dispute over the attribution of priority for a neo-lamarckian mechanism is premature and unseemly, to say the least, and may help make science seem ridiculous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamarck, Dr Steele and plagiarism. Nature 337, 101–102 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/337101a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/337101a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation