Skip to main content
Log in

Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The evolutionary significance of female choice is controversial1. Central to the issue are the mechanisms and criteria used by females to choose among potential sexual partners. For example, females merely responding to conspicuous displays that are uncorrelated with male condition or quality would neither incur costs of assessment nor gain benefits over and above random mating2. Here we show that selective phonotaxis by female gray tree frogs depends on non-arbitrary acoustic cues that indicate the male's species and energetic costs of signal production. Furthermore, some female preferences cannot be explained by differences in signal conspicuousness (acoustic energy) alone. Females obviously benefit by rejecting genetically incompatible, heterospecific males, which can be identified solely by pulse rate. Females also select among conspecific males on the basis of call duration, which is correlated with a male's energetic investment in courtship and probably indicates his physical condition and fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Partridge, L. & Halliday, T. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach 2nd edn (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 222–250 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parker, G. A. in Mate Choice (ed. Bateson, P.) 141–164 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Halliday, T. R. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 180–213 (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fellers, G. M. Anim. Behav. 27, 107–119 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arak, A. Nature 306, 261–262 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taigen, T. L. & Wells, K. D. J. comp. Physiol. B 155, 163–170 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wells, K. D. & Taigen, T. L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 9–18 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burger, J. C. thesis, Univ. Missouri (1980).

  9. Gerhardt, H. C. Science 199, 992–994 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Dover, New York, 1958).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersson, M. Nature 299, 818–820 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Majerus, M. E. N., O'Donald, P. & Weir, J. Nature 300, 521–523 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersson, M. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17, 375–393 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambrechts, M. & Dohndt, A. A. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 57–63 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Majerus, M. E. N. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–7 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerhardt, H. C. Behaviour 49, 130–151 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klump, G., Gerhardt, H. Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs. Nature 326, 286–288 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/326286a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/326286a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation