Skip to main content
Log in

Electroreception and electrolocation in platypus

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Electroreceptors with sensitivity in the microvolt range, which mainly function to detect live prey, are well known in phylogenetically old fishes and some amphibians1–4. In African mormyriform and South American gymnotiform fishes this sense has evolved to an active system using an electric organ as a source for impedance measurement of the environment and for communication5,6. Electroreception in higher vertebrates has not previously been reported. Here we establish that the platypus, the Australian nocturnal diving monotreme, can locate and avoid objects on the basis of d.c. fields. High–frequency sensitivity to a.c. could allow the detection of muscle activity of animals, such as crustaceans, which are preyed on by the platypus. Recordings of cortical evoked potentials showed that the bill of the platypus, previously considered to be exclusively mechanoreceptive7–9, is also an electroreceptive organ with behavioural and electrophysiological sensitivity of ∼50 µV cm−1. Several lines of evidence suggest that electroreception has evolved independently in this monotreme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bullock, T. H. A. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 121–170 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fritzsch, B. & Wahnschaffe, U. Cell Tissue Res. 229, 483–503 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalmijn, A. J. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. III/3, 147–200 (Springer, Berlin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scheich, H. in Biophysics, 764–776 (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heiligenberg, W. Principles of Electrolocation and Jamming Avoidance in Electric Fish (Springer, Berlin, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheich, H. & Bullock, T. H. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. III/3 201–256 (Springer, Berlin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bohringer, R. C. & Rowe, M. J. J. comp. Neurol. 174, 1–14 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poulton, E. B. J. Physiol., Lond. 5, 15–16 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, J. T. & Martin, C. J. Linn. Soc. NSW, Macleay mem. Vol., 190–200 (1893).

  10. Digkgraaf, S. & Kalmijn, A. J. Z. vergl. Physiol. 47, 438–456 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Himstedt, W., Kopp, J. & Schmidt, W. Naturwissenschaftern 69, 552 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Crowther, A. B. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm., 96–99 (1879).

  13. Faragher, R. A., Grant, T. R. & Carrick, F. N. Aust. J. Ecol. 4, 171–179 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant, T. R., Williams, R. & Carrick, F. N. Aust. Zool. 19, 117–124 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andres, K. H. & von Düring, M. in Sensory Receptor Mechanisms 81–89 (World Science, Singapore, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Münz, H., Claas, B. & Fritzsch, B. J. comp. Physiol. A 154, 33–44 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett, M. V. L. in Fish Physiology, 492–600 (Academic, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Szabo, T. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. III/3, 13–58 (Springer, Berlin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheich, H., Langner, G., Tidemann, C. et al. Electroreception and electrolocation in platypus. Nature 319, 401–402 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/319401a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/319401a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation