Skip to main content
Log in

Fractal characterization of inhomogeneous geophysical measuring networks

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The measuring stations of most in situ geophysical networks are spatially distributed in a highly inhomogeneous manner, being mainly concentrated on continents and population centres. When inhomogeneity occurs over a wide range of scales in a space of dimension E, it can be characterized by a fractal dimension Dm. For measuring networks, there is no reason to assume a priori that Dm equals E; it will usually be less than E. The world meteorological network studied here is an example on a surface for which E = 2 (the surface of the Earth) whereas, the network has an empirical dimension Dm ≍ 1.75. Whenever Dm < E, any sufficiently sparsely distributed phenomena (with dimension Dp<EDm, here 0.25), cannot be detected—even if the network is infinite. Because these rare phenomena are the most intense, this insufficient dimensional resolution is associated with biases in geophysical statistics, serious difficulties in interpolating measurements to a uniform grid, and problems in calibrating remotely-sensed information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandelbrot, B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. (Freeman, San Francisco).

  2. Roux, J. C., Simoy, R. H. & Swinney, H. L. Physica 8D, 257–266 (1983).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Grassberger, P. & Procaccia, I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 346–349 (1983).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Grassberger, P. & Procaccia, I. Physica 9 D, 189–208 (1983).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicolis, C. & Nicolis, G. Nature 311, 529–532 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hentschel, H. G. E. & Procaccia, I. Physica, 8D, 435–444 (1983).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Grassberger, P. Phys. Lett. 97, 227–230 (1983).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Schertzer, D. & Lovejoy, S. Symp. on Turbulence and Chaotic Phenomena in Fluids, 141–144 (IUTAM, Kyoto, Japan, 1983).

  9. Mandelbrot, B. J. Stat. Phys. 34, 895–930 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parisi, O. & Frisch, O. Turbulence and predictability in geophysical fluid dynamics and climate dynamics (eds. Ghil, M. et al.) 84–88 (International School of Physics, Enrico Fermi, Varenna, Italy, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shertzer, D. & Lovejoy, S. Turbulent Shear Flow, Vol. 4 (ed. Launder, B.) 7–33 (Springer, New York, 1985).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Schertzer, D. & Lovejoy, S. PCH J. (in the press).

  13. Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D. AMS Bull. (in the press).

  14. Lovejoy, S. & Schertzer, D. Digital Image Processing in Remote Sensing, Ch. 14 (ed. Muller, P. J.) (Taylor and Francis, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsonis, A. A. Preprint (Univ. Wisconsin).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D. & Ladoy, P. Fractal characterization of inhomogeneous geophysical measuring networks. Nature 319, 43–44 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/319043a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/319043a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation