Skip to main content
Log in

Response regulation and sensory control in Halobacterium halobium based on an oscillator

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Swimming bacteria reveal a simple mode of behaviour: their flagella rotate clockwise or counterclockwise by turns and they respond to external stimuli by changing the duration of reversal intervals, thereby migrating in gradients towards attractants or away from repellents in a ‘biased three-dimensional random walk’. The molecular mechanism that regulates the directional change of flagellar rotation is unknown. The light-controlled behaviour of the archaebacterium Halobacterium halobium bears many similarities to chemotaxis in eubacteria1, and offers the advantage of studying the events with a better resolution in time. We have now found in H. halobium that the distribution of the interval length between reversals is log normal and not exponential, as it is in Escherichia coli. During the interval, the rsponsiveness of the cells to attractant stimuli changes in a sawtooth-shaped manner. These results indicate that the intervals between reversals in this organism are regulated by an oscillator which is influenced in opposite directions by attractant and repellent stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hildebrand, E. & Schimz, A. Photochem. Photobiol. 38, 583–597 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alam, M. & Oesterhelt, D. J. molec. Biol. 176, 459–475 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dencher, N. A. & Hildebrand, E. Z. Naturforsch. 34 c, 841–847 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sperling, W. & Schimz, A. Biophys. struct. Mech. 6, 165–169 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spudich, J. L. & Bogomolni, A. Nature 312, 509–513 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hildebrand, E. & Dencher, N. Nature 257, 46–68 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spudich, J. L. & Stoeckenius, W. Photobiochem. Photobiophys. 1, 43–53 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hildebrand, E. & Schimz, A. Photochem. Photobiol. 37, 581–584 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berg, H. C. & Brown, D. A. Nature 239, 500–504 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Block, S. M., Segall, J. E. & Berg, H. C. J. Bact. 154, 312–322 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hildebrand, E. in Receptors and Recognition, Ser. B, Vol. 5 (ed. Hazelbauer, G.) 37–73 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koshland, D. E. Jr Bacterial Chemotaxis as a Model Behavioral System (Raven, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schimz, A., Hildebrand, E. Response regulation and sensory control in Halobacterium halobium based on an oscillator. Nature 317, 641–643 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/317641a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/317641a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation