Skip to main content
Log in

Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Following Mandelbrot1, recent studies2–6 demonstrate that some natural surfaces are fractal. Here we show that transects across vegetation are fractal, and consider one possible consequence of this observation for arthropods (mainly insects) living on plant surfaces. An important feature of a fractal curve or surface is that its length or area, respectively, becomes disproportionately large as the unit of measurement is decreased1. This suggests that if vegetation has a fractal structure, there is more usable space for smaller animals living on vegetation than for larger animals. Hence, there should be more individuals with a small body length than a large body length. We show that this is the case, and that relative numbers of small and large individual arthropods collected from vegetation are broadly consistent with theoretical predictions originating from the fractal nature of vegetation7 and individual rates of resource utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandelbrot, B. B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Avnir, D., Farin, D. & Pfeifer, P. Nature 308, 261–263 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandelbrot, B. B., Passoja, D. E. & Paullay, A. J. Nature 308, 721–722 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandelbrot, B. B. Science 156, 636–638 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burroughs, P. A. Nature 294, 240–242 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradbury, D. G., Reichelt, R. E. & Green, D. G. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 14, 295–296 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawton, J. H. in Plant Surfaces (eds Juniper, B. E. & Southwood, T. R. E.) (Edward Arnold, London, in the press).

  8. Richardson, L. F. Gen. Syst. 6, 139–187 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paumgartner, D., Losa, G. & Weibel, E. R. J. Microsc. 121, 51–63 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rigaut, J. P. J. Microsc. 131, 41–54 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Orford, J. D. & Whalley, W. B. Sedimentology 30, 655–668 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. May, R. M. in Diversity of Insect Faunas (eds Mound, L. A. & Waloff, N.) 188–204 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peters, R. H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? (Cambridge University Press, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Janzen, D. H. & Schoener, T. W. Ecology 49, 96–110 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Janzen, D. H. Ecology 54, 659–686 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrews, R. M. Breviora 454, 1–51 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hutchinson, G. E. & MacArthur, R. H. Am. Nat. 93, 117–125 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morse, D., Lawton, J., Dodson, M. et al. Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314, 731–733 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/314731a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/314731a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation