Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of antigen presentation differs in mice differing at the Mls locus

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

In the mouse, potent primary in vitro proliferation of T cells can be induced by allelic variants of cell-surface glycoproteins, Ia antigens, the genes for which are located in the I region of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 17. The only other potent primary proliferative response known is induced by mixing MHC-identical lymphocytes from strains that differ at the locus termed Mls (ref. 1) (for mixed lymphocyte stimulating), which has been mapped to chromosome 1. While it is relatively easy to raise antibodies against Ia antigens, and thus determine both their chemical nature and their role in T-cell stimulation, the nature of the product of the Mls locus has remained obscure. It has been proposed that the Mls locus product is a minor antigen recognized in association with self-Ia antigens2,3, a translocated Ia-like element4, or a mitogenic molecule found on the surface of antigen presenting cells (APC)5. Here, we demonstrate that APCs from mice carrying stimulatory Mls locus alleles present antigen more efficiently to cloned, antigen-specific, Ia-restricted T cells than APCs from mice carrying nonstimulating Mls locus alleles. We propose that the Mls locus does not encode a unique cell-surface antigen at all; we suggest instead that the T-cell proliferative response induced by Mls-locus disparate cells reflects recognition of self-Ia molecules on APCs. If our interpretation is correct, it provides further evidence both for the quantitative nature of self tolerance and for the existence of a distinct recognition site for self-Ia molecules on antigen-specific T lymphocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Festenstein, H. Immun. Rev. 15, 62–88 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peck, A. B., Janeway, C. A. Jr & Wigzell, H. Nature 266, 840–842 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janeway, C. A. Jr, Lerner, E. A., Jason, J. M. & Jones, B. Immunogenetics 10, 481–487 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peck, A. B. Folia biol., Praha 22, 38–40 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Molnar-Kimber, K. & Sprent, J. J. exp. Med. 151, 407–417 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swain, S. L. J. Immun. 125, 1224–1229 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pincus, J., Germain, R. N., Fox, I. J., Greene, M. I., Benacerraf, B. & Letvin, N. L. Cell Immun. 63, 300–307 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubreuil, P. C., Caillol, D. H. & Lemonnier, F. A. J. Immunogenet. 9, 11–24 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, B. & Janeway, C. A. Jr Immunogenetics 16, 243–255 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glasebrook, A. L. & Fitch, F. W. J. exp. Med. 151, 876–895 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Webb, S. R., Molnar-Kimber, K., Bruce, J., Sprent, J. & Wilson, D. B. J. exp. Med. 154, 1970–1974 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lutz, C. T., Glasebrook, A. L. & Fitch, F. W. Eur. J. Immun. 11, 726–734 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller, R. A. & Stutman, O. J. Immun. 128, 2258–2264 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glimcher, L. A., Longo, D. L., Green, I. & Schwartz, R. H. J. exp. Med. 154, 1652–1670 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matis, L. A. et al. J. exp. Med. 155, 508–523 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Conrad, P. J., Lerner, E. A., Murphy, D. B., Jones, P. P. & Janeway, C. A., Jr J. Immun. 129, 2616–2620 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McNicholas, J. M. et al. J. exp. Med 155, 490–507 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakano, K., Nakamura, I. & Cudkowicz, G. Nature 282, 559–563 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishikawa, H. & Dutton, R. W. J. Immun. 122, 529–536 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Risser, R. & Grunwald, D. J. Nature 289, 563–568 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Janeway, C. A. Jr, Wigzell, H. & Binz, H. Scand. J. Immun. 5, 993–1001 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Janeway, C. A. Jr, Jones, B., Frischknecht, H., Binz, H. & Wigzell, H. Scand. J. Immun. 12, 83–92 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heber-Katz, E., Hansburg, D. & Schwartz, R. H. J. molec cell. Immun. (in the press).

  24. Janeway, C. A. Jr Immun. Today 3, 261–265 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sredni, B., Tse, H. Y. & Schwartz, R. H. Nature 283, 581–583 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janeway, C. A. Jr, Lerner, E. A., Conrad, P. J. & Jones, B. Behring Inst. Mitt. 70, 200–209 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janeway, C., Conrad, P., Tite, J. et al. Efficiency of antigen presentation differs in mice differing at the Mls locus. Nature 306, 80–82 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/306080a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/306080a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation