Skip to main content
Log in

Solar radius change between 1925 and 1979

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

By analysing numerous reports, from different locations, on the duration of totality of the solar eclipses on 24 January 1925, and on 26 February 1979, we have found that the solar radius at the earlier date was 0.5 arc s, or 375 km larger than at the later date. The correction to the standard solar radius found for each eclipse was different when different subsets of the observations were used (for example, edge of path of totality timings compared with central timings), suggesting the existence of systematic inaccuracies in our knowledge of the lunar figure. However, the differences between the corrections for both eclipses were very similar for all subsets considered, indicating that changes of the solar size may be reliably inferred despite the existence of the lunar figure errors, as long as the proper consideration is made of the distribution of the observations. We consider that these results are strong evidence in support of the occurrence of solar radius changes on shorter than evolutionary time scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Endal, A. S. & Sofia, S. Astrophys. J. 243, 625–640 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sofia, S., O'Keefe, J., Lesh, J. R. & Endal, A. S. Science 204, 1306–1308 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunham, D. W., Sofia, S., Fiala, A. D., Herald, D. & Muller, P. M. Science 210, 1243–1245 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilliland, R. L. Astrophys. J. 248, 1144–1155 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro, I. I. Science 208, 51–53 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkinson, J. H., Morrison, L. V. & Stephenson, F. R. Nature 288, 548–551 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sofia, S., Dunham, D. W. & Fiala, A. D. in Proc. Conf. Ancient Sun, 147 (Lunar and Planetary Science Institute, Houston, Texas 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, H. N. Scient. Am. January, 13 (1925).

  9. Brown, E. W. Astr. J. 37, 9–19 (1926).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Magalhaes, F. V. et al.. Trans. Illumin. Engng Soc. 20, 565–628 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seagrave, F. E. Popular Astr. 33, 279 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herald, D. Moon 15, 91–107 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watts, C. B. Astr. Pap. Am. Ephem. 17, (1964).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sofia, S., Dunham, D., Dunham, J. et al. Solar radius change between 1925 and 1979. Nature 304, 522–526 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304522a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304522a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation