Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of super-secondary structure in proteins

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Various methods for the prediction of secondary structure from amino acid sequence can consistently achieve on average 60% accuracy when tested for several proteins1–3. Improvement on this value has proved difficult, despite increasing the size of the data set and refining predictive techniques4. The difficulty almost certainly derives from the influence of long-range interactions and the restrictions required to attain favourable protein topologies. We describe here a novel approach to structure prediction from amino acid sequence based on the recognition of super-secondary structure. The structure we initially consider is the βαβ unit, which consists of two parallel β-strands connected by an α-helix. From an analysis of all known βαβ units, an ideal secondary structure sequence was derived. This was used as a template to locate probable βαβ sequences in a standard secondary structure prediction. The method correctly predicted the location of 70% of the βαβ units in 16 β/α type proteins. This led to a 7.5% average improvement over the original secondary structure prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chou, P. Y. & Fasman, G. D. Biochemistry 13, 211–245 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garnier, J., Osguthorpe, D. J. & Robson, B. J. molec. Biol. 120, 97–120 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulz, G. E. & Schirmer, R. H. Principles of Protein Structure (Springer, Berlin, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Palau, J., Argos, P. & Puigdomenech, P. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 19, 394–401 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Busseta, B. & Hospital, M. Biochim. biophys. Acta 701, 111–118 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein, F. C. et al. J. molec. Biol. 112, 535–542 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, F. E., Sternberg, M. J. E. & Taylor, W. R. J. molec. Biol. 156, 821–862 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews, B. W. Biochim. biophys. Acta 405, 442–451 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brahms, S. & Brahms, J. J. molec. Biol. 138, 149–178 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, R. W. & Dunker, A. K. J. molec. Biol. 152, 783–831 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao, S. T. & Rossmann, M. G. J. molec. Biol. 76, 241–256 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson, J. S. Nature 268, 495–500 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, W., Thornton, J. Prediction of super-secondary structure in proteins. Nature 301, 540–542 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/301540a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/301540a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation