Skip to main content
Log in

Inclinations of the uranian rings

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Rings formed with the birth of a planet are thought to arise after planetary condensation, from material remaining within the outer accretion limit—which has a radius of approximately two planetary radii, depending on the density of the material and the relative size of the particles1,2. Although the initial distribution of particles would be spherical, collisions would cause rapid evolution of the particle orbits into circular orbits in the equatorial plane of the planet3. Also, gaps might form at the position of strong resonances with the planet's satellites, in an otherwise broad ring. Observations of planetary rings at high spatial resolution have revealed a more complex situation. The nine confirmed uranian rings are narrow, not broad, and most have elliptical orbits, not circular. Furthermore, the Voyager observations have shown that Saturn's rings consist of a multitude of narrow ringlets, at least some of which have elliptical orbits. Here we report an additional feature that we have found for the uranian ring orbits, not predicted by current theoretical models: at least seven of the nine rings have orbits inclined to the equatorial plane of Uranus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smoluchowski, R. Nature 280, 377–378 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elliot, J. L. et al. Nature 294, 526–529 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns, J. A. in The New Solar System, 129–142 (Sky Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elliot, J. L., Dunham, E., Wasserman, L. H., Millis, R. L. & Churms, J. Astr. J. 83, 980–992 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholson, P. D., Persson, S. E., Matthews, K., Goldreich, P. & Neugebauer, G. Astr. J. 83, 1240–1248 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elliot, J. L. et al. Astr. J. 86, 127–134 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholson, P. D., Matthews, K. & Goldreich, P. Astr. J. 86, 596–606 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicholson, P. D., Matthews, K. & Goldreich, P. Astr. J. 87, 433–447 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elliot, J. L. et al. Astr. J. 86, 444–445 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. French, R. G. et al. Icarus (submitted).

  11. Goldreich, P. & Tremaine, S. Astr. J. 84, 1638–1641 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smoluchowski, R. Commun. Astrophys. 8, 69–78 (1979).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aggarwal, H. R. & Obserbeck, V. R. Astrophys. J. 191, 577–588 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldreich, P. & Tremaine, S. Nature 277, 97–98 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldreich, P. & Tremaine, S. Astrophys. J. 243, 1062–1075 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

French, R., Elliot, J. & Allen, D. Inclinations of the uranian rings. Nature 298, 827–829 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/298827a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/298827a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation