Skip to main content
Log in

Moving and the motion after-effect

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The movement after-effect (MAE) is caused by inspecting a pattern in which many stimulus elements in the visual field are in coherent movement; after inspection, stationary elements seem to move in the opposite direction. By far the commonest cause of such a retinal stimulus is movement of the observer, not movement of the environment. We suggest here, therefore, that the usual laboratory stimulus for inducing the MAE presents the observer with conflicting sensory cues. The optical input is normally associated with self motion, but other cues such as the vestibular input simultaneously tell the observer that he is stationary. In these circumstances a recalibration of the relationship between optical and other information might occur and we suggest that the after-effect may be at least in part a consequence of this recalibration, rather than being entirely due to a passive fatigue-like process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wohlgemuth, A. Br. J. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl. 1, 1–117 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, L., Morgan, M. & Still, A. Moving and the motion after-effect. Nature 293, 139–141 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/293139a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/293139a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation