Skip to main content
Log in

Stones, pits and Stonehenge

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

There have been many mathematical or astronomical explanations of the construction of certain elements at Stonehenge1–9. In 1979 a small salvage excavation at the site resulted in the chance discovery of a prehistoric pit dug to take a standing stone. The recognition that such substantial structures can exist unknown at Stonehenge is important to those who seek alignments or patterns in the locations of neolithic features. That ‘known’ arrangements could be affected by such unexpected discoveries is here illustrated with a preliminary reassessment of the significance of the Heelstone and the Station Stones (a full description of all aspects of Stonehenge is given in ref. 10).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawkins, G. S. Nature 200, 306–8 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hawkins, G. S. Nature 202, 1258–61 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyle, F. Nature 211, 454–6 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Newham, C. A. Nature 211, 456–8 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colton, R. & Martin, R. L. Nature 213, 476–8 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colton, R. & Martin, R. L. Nature 221, 1011–12 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson, J. H. Nature 225, 1236–7 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Newton, R. R. & Jenkins, R. R. Nature 239, 511–2 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Atkinson, R. J. C. Nature 275, 50–2 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, R. M. Antiquity 49, 251–66 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newall, R. S. Antiquity 3, 75–88 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoare, R. C. The Ancient History of South Wiltshire, 144 (William Miller, London, 1812).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Long, W. Wiltshire Archaeol. nat. Hist. Mag. 16, 33 (1876).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lukis, W. C. Proc. Soc. Antiquaries 7, 2nd Ser., 268–71 (1877).

  16. Newall, R. S. Wiltshire Archaeol. nat. Hist. Mag. 61, 93 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge, 203 (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hawley, W. Antiquaries J. 1, 30 (1921).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge, 78–79 (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge, 70 (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge, 33 (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pitts, M. Stones, pits and Stonehenge. Nature 290, 46–47 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/290046a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/290046a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation