Skip to main content
Log in

Pirenzepine distinguishes between different subclasses of muscarinic receptors

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Some antagonists exhibit tissue selectivity in their pharmacological antagonism of muscarinic responses1. However, the affinity constants for equilibrium binding of classical antagonists to muscarinic receptors in subcellular preparations have shown only small variations in different peripheral tissues and regions of the brain2–6. The binding curves do not deviate significantly from the simple Langmuir isotherm, indicating apparent homogeneity of the receptor population in any given region 5–8. In contrast, heterogeneity has been detected by agonist binding studies8,9 but this may arise from different environmental or coupling restraints on the agonist-induced conformational change10,11 and cannot be taken as evidence for different receptor subtypes. We report here binding studies using a new anti-muscarinic drug, pirenzepine, in which we found heterogeneity of binding that correlates well with the pharmacological activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barlow, R. B., Berry, K. J., Glenton, P. A. M., Nicolau, N. M. & Soh, K. S. Br. J. Pharmac. 58, 613–620 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beld, A. J. & Ariens, E. J. Eur. J. Pharmac. 25, 203–209 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamamura, H. I. & Snyder, S. H. Molec. Pharmac. 10, 861–867 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burgen, A. S. V., Hiley, C. R. & Young, J. M. Br. J. Pharmac. 50, 145–151 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Birdsall, N. J. M., Hulme, E. C. & Burgen, A. S. V. Proc. R. Soc. (in the press).

  6. Kloog, Y., Egozi, Y. & Sokolovsky, M. Molec. Pharmac. 15, 545–558 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hulme, E. C., Birdsall, N. J. M., Burgen, A. S. V. & Mehta, P., Molec. Pharmac. 14, 737–750 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Birdsall, N. J. M. & Hulme, E. C. J. Neurochem. 27, 7–16 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Birdsall, N. J. M., Burgen, A. S. V. & Hulme, E. C. Molec. Pharmac. 14, 723–736 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Birdsall, N. J. M., Burgen, A. S. V. & Hulme, E. C. in Cholinergic Mechanisms and Psychopharmacology (ed. Jenden, D. J.) 25–33 (1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Burgen, A. S. V., Birdsall, N. J. M. & Hulme, E. C. in IUPAC Medicinal Chemistry Symposium (ed. Simkins, M. A.) (Cotswold, in the press).

  12. Leitold, M. & Engelhorn, R. Therapiewoche 27, 1517–1531 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Londong, W., Londong, V., Prechtl, R. & Eversmann, T. in Die Behandlung des Ulcus pepticum mit Pirenzepin (eds Blum, A. L. & Hammer, R.) 75–85 (Karl Demeter, Munich, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bonfils, S., Mignon, M., Danne, O. & Maria, J. Nouv. Presse Med., 6, 3544–3545 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stockbrügger, R., Jaup, B., Hammer, R. & Dotevall, G. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. (in the press).

  16. Fritsch, W. P. in Die Behandlung des Ulcus pepticum mit Pirenzepin (eds Blum, A. L. & Hammer, R.), 110–112 (Karl Demeter, Munich, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sachs, G., Kasbeker, D. K. & Berglindh, T. in Die Behandlung des Ulcus pepticum mit Pirenzepin (eds Blum, A. L. & Hammer, R.) 18–25 (Karl Demeter Munich, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons, E., Bunce, T., & Blakemore, C. in Die Behandlung des Ulcus pepticum mit Pirenzepin (eds Blum, A. L. & Hammer, R.) 26–34 (Karl Demeter, Munich, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jennewein, H. M. in Die Behandlung des Ulcus pepticum mit Pirenzepin (eds Blum, A. L. & Hammer, R.) 41–48 (Karl Demeter, Munich, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matsuo, Y. & Seki, A. Arzeneimittelforschung 29, 1028–1035 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eberlein, W., Schmidt, G. & Kutter, E. Arzneimittelforschung 27, 356 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hammer, R. & Koss, F. W. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. (in the press).

  23. Chierichetti, S. M. & Giorgi Conciato, M. in Die Behandlung des Ulcus pepticum mit Pirenzepin (eds Blum, A. L. & Hammer, R.) 178–184 (Karl Demeter, Munich, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oselladore, D. in Die Behandlung des Ulcus pepticum mit Pirenzepin (eds Blum, A. L. & Hammer, R.) 185–191 (Karl Demeter, Munich, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jain, A. K., La-Corte, W., McMahon, F. G. & Ryan, J. R. Clin. pharmac. Ther. 25, 231 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Berrie, C. P., Birdsall, N. J. M., Burgen, A. S. V. & Hulme, E. C. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 87, 1000–1005 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammer, R., Berrie, C., Birdsall, N. et al. Pirenzepine distinguishes between different subclasses of muscarinic receptors. Nature 283, 90–92 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283090a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283090a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation