Skip to main content
Log in

Confirmation of the Suess wiggles: 3200–3700 BC

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

USING dendrochronologically dated tree rings de Vries1 showed that the atmospheric 14C concentration has not been entirely constant during the past few hundred years. By extending the North American bristlecone pine tree-ring chronology2 to nearly 8,000 yr ago, several radiocarbon laboratories succeeded in measuring deviations in the 14C concentration from the mid-nineteenth century natural 14C level to a maximum of about 10% around 4000 BC (refs 3–7). Superimposed on this general trend, Suess drew with ‘cosmic schwung’, medium-term variations through his data. These so-called ‘wiggles’ should correspond with variations in the abundance of radiocarbon in atmospheric carbon dioxide on a time scale between one decade and a few centuries. The resulting irregular shape of Suess' calibration curve has been questioned during the past few years8,9. The overall result, however, is that no generally accepted 14C calibration curve is yet available. It would be most convenient to measure 14C concentrations in single tree rings with much higher precision than the usual 4–6‰. For this, however, much larger samples are required than are available from the bristlecone pine tree. An excellent opportunity was presented by the sub-fossil oak trunks discovered in the river valley sediments of southern Germany9; our measurements of these trunks are reported here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Vries, H. L. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. Proc. B61, 94–102 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferguson, C. W. Proc. 8th int. Conf. Radiocarbon Dating, Al-11 New Zealand (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Damon, P. E., Long, A. & Wallick, E. I. Proc. 8th int. Conf. Radiocarbon Dating, A28–44 (1972).

  4. Ralph, E. K. & Michael, H. N. 12th Nobel Symp., 237–245 (1970).

  5. Suess, H. E. Radioactive Dating and Methods of Low Level Counting, 143–151 (IAEA Vienna, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suess, H. E. Radiocarbon 20, 1–17 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suess, H. E. Proc. 9th int. Radiocarbon Conf. UCLA and UCSD (in the press).

  8. Clark, R. M. & Renfrew, C. Archaeometry 14, 5–19 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearson, G. W., Pilcher, J. R., Baillie, M. G. L. & Hillam, J. Nature 270, 25–28 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, P. Proc. IXth int. Radiocarbon Conf. UCLA and UCSD (in the press).

  11. Tans, P. P., de Jong, A. F. M. & Mook, W. G. Nature 271, 234–235 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tans, P. P. & Mook, W. G. Radiocarbon (in the press).

  13. Suess, H. E. & Becker, B. Proc. Symp. Die Dendrochronologie des Postglazials, 156–170 (Akad. d. Wiss. Mainz 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DE JONG, A., MOOK, W. & BECKER, B. Confirmation of the Suess wiggles: 3200–3700 BC. Nature 280, 48–49 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280048a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280048a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation