Skip to main content
Log in

Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

REPRODUCTION is often a lethal or semi-lethal activity, and for iteroparous plants it is often possible to show that reproduction has costs that are expressed in a reduced growth rate and/or an increased death rate1. Attempts have been made to compare life history patterns in flowering plants by measuring the fraction of a plant's annual dry matter production (or calorific value) that is allocated to reproduction (for example refs 2–4). The assumption is that the reproductive parts represent a cost in energy or materials. Clearly mineral nutrients and water must be gained by the reproductive structures from the remainder of the plant, but this is not necessarily true for the energetic and carbon economy of the reproductive structures. Many flowers and fruits are green and a fraction of the energy and carbon might be obtained by direct photosynthesis within these structures. This might be especially important during embryo growth if carpels and other organs that remain attached after flowering are green. In such cases the conventional estimation of reproductive effort (dividing seed weight by plant weight) would be incorrect and comparison of life history patterns and their evolutionary meaning would be invalid. There are reports of significant contributions of in situ photosynthesis in flower and seeds to their growth. Biscoe et al. have estimated that 47% of the carbon required for seed production in barley is provided by photosynthesis of reproductive and immediately adjacent plant structures5. Bazzaz and Carlson have shown that in the annual weed Ambrosia trifida L., net photosynthesis by reproductive structures amounts to 41 and 51%, respectively, of the carbon required for male and female inflorescences6. Here we report an analysis of the carbon budget of reproduction for 15 temperate deciduous trees. The budget was determined by measuring the weight, photosynthesis and dark respiration of flowers or inflorescences from bud break until seed maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper, J. L. Population Biology in Plants (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden, J. thesis, Univ. Wales (1968).

  3. Abrahamson, W. G. & Gadgil, M. D. Am. Nat. 107, 651–666 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gadgil, M. D. & Solbrig, O. T. Am. Nat. 106, 14–31 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biscoe, P. V., Gallagher, J. N., Littleton, E. J., Monteith, J. L. & Scott, R. K. J. appl. Ecol. 12, 295–318 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bazzaz, F. A. & Carlson, R. W. New Phytol. 82, 223–232 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bazzaz, F. A. & Boyer, J. S. Ecology 53, 343–349 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BAZZAZ, F., CARLSON, R. & HARPER, J. Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits. Nature 279, 554–555 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279554a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/279554a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation