Skip to main content
Log in

Neural influence on acetylcholine receptor clusters in embryonic development of skeletal muscles

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE extent to which innervation regulates the embryonic development of skeletal muscle, and the mechanisms of nerve–muscle trophic interactions during development, are little understood. Here we describe studies on the development of skeletal muscles in rat embryos in which all the motoneurones were destroyed, and experiments in which chronic application of tetrodotoxin (TTX) to individual embryos blocked all nerve and muscle electrical activity during neuromuscular junction formation. The results are presented with special emphasis on the regulation of acetylcholine (ACh) receptor distribution. It is already known that ACh receptors in adult tissues are densely clustered under nerve terminals on both muscle1 and nerve cells2. Relatively few receptors are found in extrajunctional regions, and if these are present at all they are uniformly dispersed. Studies of individually teased muscle fibres from rat embryos have shown receptor aggregates (clusters or hotspots) to be present after 16 d gestation3, but no more is known about how these clusters are induced to form or to achieve their proper location. Studies of mouse, chick and toad muscles in tissue culture have shown that receptor clusters may form on myotubes that have developed in the absence of nerve tissue4–6. In cultured toad muscle these clusters migrate within the muscle membrane to locate beneath nerve terminals5. Here, we show that receptor clusters appear on embryonic rat muscle after 15½d gestation, with striking synchrony in timing, and an ordering of the position of clusters on different fibres within a muscle. These initial events were little changed after irreversible destruction of motoneurones at 14 d gestation except that additional receptor clusters appeared at later times. Paralysis of developing nerve and muscle with TTX did not affect the appearance and progressive increase in size of junctional clusters, but extrajunctional clusters also appeared, as in the denervated muscles. These experiments show that the first appearance of ACh receptor clusters on embryonic skeletal muscle does not depend on innervation, but that the final ordering of their position on muscle fibres and their later increase in size do require the presence, although not the electrical activity, of the nerve. Electrical activity of nerve and/or muscle is essential to suppress the appearance of extrajunctional receptor clusters, and for the normal progress of muscle growth. This study shows also that mammalian embryos are more accessible to experimental manipulation than may previously have been realised, so that toxins and metabolites may be chronically applied to embryonic tissues in vivo, as well as in tissue culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fambrough, D. M. & Hartzell, H. C. Science 176, 189–191 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris, A. J., Kuffler, S. W. & Dennis, M. J. Proc. R. Soc. B177, 541–553 (1971).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bevan, S. & Steinbach, J. H. J. Physiol., Lond. 267, 195–213 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, S. A. & Fischbach, G. D. Science 181, 76–78 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, M. J., Cohen, M. W. & Zorychta, E. J. Physiol., Lond. 268, 731–756 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christian, C. N. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 4011–4015.

  7. Kelly, R. B. & Brown, F. R. J. Neurobiol. 5, 135–150 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abe, T., Limbrick, A. R. & Miledi, R. Proc. R. Soc. B194, 545–553 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirokawa, N. J. comp. Neurol. 180, 449–466 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett, M. R. & Pettigrew, A. G. J. Physiol., Lond. 241, 515–545 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly, A. M. & Zachs, S. I. J. Cell Biol. 42, 154–169 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, A. J. A. Rev. Physiol. 36, 251–305 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinbach, J. H., Harris, A. J., Patrick, J., Schubert, D. & Heinemann, S. J. gen. Physiol. 62, 255–270 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pestronk, A., Drachman, D. B. & Griffin, J. W. Nature 260, 352–353 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavoie, P.-A., Collier, B. & Tenenhouse, A. Expl Neurol. 54, 148–171 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Albuquerque, E. X., Warnick, J. E., Tasse, J. R. & Sansone, F. M. Expl Neurol. 37, 607–634 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cangiano, A. & Fried, J. A. J. Physiol., Lond. 265, 63–84 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lux, H. D., Schubert, P., Kreutzberg, G. W. & Globus, A. Expl Brain Res. 10, 197–204 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bray, J. J., Hubbard, J. I. & Mills, R. G. J. Physiol., Lond. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRAITHWAITE, A., HARRIS, A. Neural influence on acetylcholine receptor clusters in embryonic development of skeletal muscles. Nature 279, 549–551 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279549a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/279549a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation