Skip to main content
Log in

Territorial behaviour of Pemphigus gall aphids

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

ALTHOUGH insects are known to defend nests, breeding sites and females1, the defence of feeding sites is less well documented. Other than the defence of egg clutches and nymphs by female treehoppers2 and the existence of a soldier caste in wooly aphids3, territoriality has not been reported in the large insect order Homoptera which includes aphids, scale insects, hoppers, cicadas and whiteflies. As the evolution of territoriality is thought to be directly correlated with competition for resources in short supply4, territorial behaviour should only be exhibited when population densities approach the carrying capacity of the environment. Because parthenogenetic reproduction and the high population growth rates of aphids seem contradictory to the notion of limited resources, aphid territorial behaviour is not expected. I report here on the settling behaviour of the aphid, Pemphigus betae Doane, which forms galls of the leaf blade of narrowleaf cottonwood, Populus angustifolia. We have quantified the existence of a defended micro-territory, the production of a floater population of individuals displaced through competitive interactions, and the differential mortality of residents and floaters which favours the evolution of territorial behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Price, P. W. Insect Ecology (Wiley, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wood, T. K. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 69, 340–344 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aoki, S. Kontyû, Tokyo 45, 276–282 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, J. L. Wilson Bull. 76, 160–169 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whitham, T. G. Ecology 59, 1164–1174 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitham, T. G. Am. Nat. (in the press).

  7. Moore, N. W. J. Anim. Ecol. 33, 49–71 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alcock, J. Anim. Behav. 23, 889–895 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, N. B. Anim. Behav. 26, 138–147 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker, G. A. J. theor. Biol. 47, 223–243 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart, R. E. & Aldrich, J. W. Auk 68, 471–482 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hensley, M. M. & Cope, J. B. Auk 68, 483–493 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerking, S. E. Ecology 34, 347–365 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Healey, M. C. Ecology 48, 377–392 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Watson, A. Nature 215, 1274–1275 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smyth, M. J. Anim. Ecol. 37, 167–183 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krebs, J. R. Ecology 52, 2–22 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmer, M. A. Aphids of the Rocky Mountain Region (Hirschfield, Denver, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITHAM, T. Territorial behaviour of Pemphigus gall aphids. Nature 279, 324–325 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279324a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/279324a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation