Skip to main content
Log in

Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE profound anterograde amnesia that has been attributed in the clinical literature to damage of the hippocampal system1,2 has not been observed in animals with such damage. Hippocampal-system lesions in animals do markedly impair some forms of spatial memory3,4, but the effects on other forms of memory have generally seemed minor5,6 compared with the dramatic disorder described in man7,8. This discrepancy between the clinical and animal literature could indicate a true evolutionary shift in the functions of the hippocampus9,10, or, at the other extreme, it could simply reflect the use of incommensurate measures across species11,12. (Strong support for this second interpretation has been provided by Gaffan13.) A third possibility, however, is that the discrepancy points to inaccurate localisation of the neuropathology in man that is responsible for the profound amnesia. Support for this last alternative comes from new evidence in monkeys indicating that a striking impairment in visual memory can be produced by the combined ablation of the hippocampal formation and the amygdaloid body, but not by ablation of either of these structures alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Barbizet, J. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 26, 127–135 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brion, S. Int. J. Neural. 7, 31–43 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahut, H. Neuropsychologia 9, 409–424 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Olton, D. S. Scientific Amer. 236, 82–98 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiskrantz, L. in Cognitive Processes of Nonhuman Primates (ed. Jarrard, L. E.) (Academic, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iversen, S. D. in International Review of Neurobiology (eds Pfeiffer, C. C. & Smythies, J. R.) (Academic, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Milner, B. in Amnesia (eds Whitty, C. W. M. & Zangwill, O. L.) (Butterworths, London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zangwill, O. L. in Amnesia (eds Whitty, C. W. M. & Zangwill, O. L.) (Butterworths, London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Woody, C. D. & Ervin, F. R. Physiol. Behav. 1, 273–280 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drewe, E. A., Ettlinger, G., Milner, A. D. & Passingham, R. E. Cortex 6, 129–163 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiskrantz, L. & Warrington, E. K. in The Hippocampus (eds Isaacson, R. L. & Pribram, K. H.) (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaffan, D. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 86, 1100–1109 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaffan, D. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 29, 504–514 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mishkin, M. & Delacour, J. J. exp. Psychol: Anim. Behav. Proc. 1, 326–334 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mishkin, M., Prockop, E. S. & Rosvold, H. E. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 55, 178–181 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Herzog, A. G. & Van Hoesen, G. W. Brain Res. 115, 57–69 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turner, B. H., Mishkin, M. & Knapp, M. E. Neurosci. Abstr. 2, 398 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Hoesen, G. W. & Pandya, D. N. Brain Res. 95, 1–24 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Hoesen, G. W., Pandya, D. N. & Butters, N. Brain Res. 95, 25–38 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Hoesen, G. W. & Pandya, D. N. Brain Res. 95, 39–59 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nauta, W. J. H. J. Anat. 95, 515–531 (1961).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Poletti, C. E. & Cresswell, G. J. comp. Neurol. 175, 101–128 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MISHKIN, M. Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature 273, 297–298 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/273297a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/273297a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation