Skip to main content
Log in

Cell saturation density is not determined by a diffusion-limited process

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE mouse cell line 3T3 ceases cell division at a confluent saturation density despite regular medium replacement. Also, when a confluent quiescent monolayer of 3T3 is wounded, cells migrate into the wound free of cell contact and initiate DNA synthesis, while cells in the monolayer remain arrested1. As the cells in both areas are in the same bulk medium, this experiment proves that depletion of growth factors in the bulk medium is itself not sufficient to account for density-dependent inhibition of growth. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the wounding experiment. The first states that direct cell–cell contact, perhaps involving the interaction of a receptor with its ligand on an adjacent cell, provides a negative signal for growth1. The second hypothesis states that growth ceases at a confluent cell density because of the establishment of a diffusion boundary layer which maintains the supply of one or more growth factors below a critical level2. A diffusion boundary layer results because convective movement of liquids near a solid surface approaches zero. In these conditions, the rate of delivery of molecules to and from the surface is limited by the rate of diffusion through the boundary layer. Increased fluid velocity on confluent cells causes initiation of DNA synthesis2,3, a finding apparently supporting the diffusion barrier hypothesis. Theoretically, increasing the fluid velocity over the cell layer should decrease the thickness of the hypothetical boundary layer and therefore increase the rate of delivery of a diffusion-limited growth-controlling substance4. However, in these experiments it was not possible to rule out an effect of fluid velocity on cell–cell contact. Yet if growth is a diffusion-limited process, then increasing viscosity of the cell culture medium should decrease the saturation density. We report here that increased viscosity has no effect on saturation density or on the rate of cell growth, providing strong evidence against the diffusion barrier hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dulbecco, R. & Stoker, M. G. P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 66, 204–210 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoker, M. G. P. Nature 246, 200–203 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoker, M. & Piggott, D. Cell 3, 207–215 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levich, V. G. Physiochemical Hybrodynamics (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barrow, G. M. Physical Chemistry (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maroudes, N. G. Cell 3, 217–219 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Petris, S. in Concanavalin A as a Tool (eds Higer, H. B. & Schnebli, H. P.) 95–116 (John Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whittenberger, B. & Glaser, L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 2251–2255 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITTENBERGER, B., GLASER, L. Cell saturation density is not determined by a diffusion-limited process. Nature 272, 821–823 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/272821a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/272821a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation