Skip to main content
Log in

Regularity versus irregularity in specific songs of closely-related drosophilid flies

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE songs of most insect species are stereotyped and show regular rhythms1,2 which can be readily defined and described. In such cases, closely related species produce songs which differ in rhythmic structure3–5, carrier frequency5,6 or combinations of these parameters3,7. We have examined the songs produced during courtship of the sibling drosophilid fly species Zaprionus tuberculatus, Z. sepsoides and Z. mascariensis which are known from morphometric8 and chromosomal evidence to be closely related. Drosophilid songs are produced by wing beating and normally consist of a regular series of similar mono- or polycyclic sound pulses with carrier frequencies of 150 to 500 Hz and pulse periods of 8 to 250 ms (for review, see ref. 9). Some species produce more than one type of song, and the pulsed song may be interrupted by protracted bursts of constant frequency tone10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dumortier, B. in Acoustic Behaviour of Animals (ed. Busnel, R-G.) 346–372 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, R. D. A. Rev. Ent. 12, 495–526 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leroy, Y. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg. 100, 1–134 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ewing, A. W. & Bennet-Clark, H. C. Behaviour 31, 288–301 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker, T. J. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62, 752–726 (1969).

  6. Bennet-Clark, H. C. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. B 39, 125–132 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ulagaraz, S. M. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 69, 299–306 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsacas, L. et al. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. (N.S.) 13, 391–415 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bennet-Clark, H. C. Verh. dt. zool. Ges. 1975, 18–28 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Schilcher, F. Anim. Behav. 24, 18–26 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennet-Clark, H. C. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 49, 127–128 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pearson, E. S. & Hartley, H. O. eds Biometrika Tables for Statisticians 2, section 8 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972).

  13. Waldron, I. Science 144, 191–193 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennet-Clark, H. C. & Ewing, A. W. Anim. Behav. 17, 755–759 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. von Schilcher, F. Anim. Behav. 24, 622–625 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krebs, J. R. Anim. Behav. 25, 475–478 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marler, P. in Simpler Networks and Behaviour (ed. Fentress, J. C.) 314–329 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ewing, A. W. Rev. comp. Anim. 4, 3–8 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wyman, R. J. in Simpler Networks and Behaviour (ed. Fentress,J. C.) 153–166 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ewing, A. W. J. comp. Physiol. 119, 249–265 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BENNET-CLARK, H., LEROY, Y. Regularity versus irregularity in specific songs of closely-related drosophilid flies. Nature 271, 442–444 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271442a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271442a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation