Skip to main content
Log in

Angle of subduction

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

PLATE tectonics is well established as an empirical description for modification of the Earth's outermost solid layer, although the dynamics of the plates are poorly understood. One view is that the plates are surface manifestations of the deep mantle convection which must inevitably occur if there are deepseated energy sources1. Mantle convection, however, may not be an efficient driver of plate motions2, and the negative buoyancy of subducting slabs may be more important2, 3. We consider here a simple fluid dynamical model which illustrates some of the general principles of subduction dynamics, and suggest an explanation for the observed subduction angle (the angle between the subducting slab and the Earth's surface). The model depends on the concept of a ‘critical’ negative buoyancy that plate material must attain before it can undergo steady-state subduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turcotte, D. L. & Oxburgh, E. R. An. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 33–68 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter, F. M. Tectonophysics 38, 61–88 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Forsyth, D. & Uyeda, S. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 43, 163–200 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luyendyk, B. P. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81, 3411–3416 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tullis, T. E. Preprint (1977).

  6. Jischke, M. C. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4809–4813 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Isaacs, B. & Molnar, P. Nature 228, 1121–1124 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McKenzie, D. P., Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 18, 1–32 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oxburgh, E. R. & Parmentier, E. M. J. Geol Soc., Lond. 133, 343–355 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davies, G. F. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 49, 557–563 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hales, A. L. Earth planet Sci. Lett. 6, 31–34 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Froidevaux, C. & Schubert, G. J. Geophys. R. 80, 2553–2564 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Melosh, H. J. Tectonophysics 35, 363–390 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. McElhinny, M. W. & McWilliams, M. O. Tectonophvsics 40, 139–159 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tovish, A., Luyendyk, B. & Schubert, G. Trans Am. Geophys. Un. EOS 57, 1002 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STEVENSON, D., TURNER, J. Angle of subduction. Nature 270, 334–336 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/270334a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/270334a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation