Skip to main content
Log in

Instability of the eye in the dark and proprioception

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE extraocular muscles of most mammals contain stretch receptors which are not necessarily in the form of muscle spindles. The cat, for example, has no muscle spindles, but the oculomotor muscles contain structures, with spiral endings, that are in parallel with the muscle fibres and respond to stretch1. Most proprioceptive fibres run extraorbitally in the ophthalmic branch of the Vth nerve2,3. The cell bodies of these fibres seem to be located in the mesencephalic root of the Vth nerve4. There is electrophysiological evidence of proprioceptive projections to the cerebellum5,6, superior colliculus7,8 and visual cortex9. The function of ocular proprioception is uncertain, although there is evidence that in man it may be an indicator of eye position in the dark10. In the cat it seems to have a role in maintaining the binocularity of single neurones in the visual cortex11,12. Because most proprioceptive fibres run into the ophthalmic branch of the Vth nerve, we have investigated eye movements in the alert animal before and after section of this branch. We report here that, in the absence of visual and vestibular stimuli, the eye ipsilateral to the section becomes unstable and performs slow pendular oscillations. Asymmetries are observed in the horizontal vestibular nystagmus recorded in total darkness from the two eyes after unilateral section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bach-y-Rita, P. & Ito, F. J. Physiol., Lond. 186, 663 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Batini, C. & Buisseret, P. Arch. ital. Biol. 112, 18 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Batini, C., Buisseret, P. & Buisseret-Dalmas, C. Brain Res. 85, 74 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buisseret, P., Guéritand, J. P., Horcholle-Bossavit, G. & Tyc-Dumont, S. J. Physiol., Paris 65, 369 A (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs, A. & Kornhuber, H. H. J. Physiol., Lond. 200, 713 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, R., Precht, W. & Llinás, R. Brain Res. 38, 440 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrahams, V. C. & Rose, P. K. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 10 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose, P. K. & Abrahams, V. C. Brain Res. 97, 95 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buisseret, P. & Maffei, L. Expl Brain Res. 28, 421 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Skavenski, A. A. Vision Res. 12, 221 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maffei, L. & Bisti, S. Science 191, 579 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. Brain Res. 105, 73 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FIORENTINI, A., MAFFEI, L. Instability of the eye in the dark and proprioception. Nature 269, 330–331 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/269330a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/269330a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation