Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are transmitter release statistics meaningful?

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

A BASIC premise of synaptic physiology is that neurotransmitter is released from motor nerve terminals in multimolecular packets called quanta1,2. The rate of release of quanta is low at rest, but when an action potential invades the nerve terminal there is a large increase in the mean rate of release leading to the generation of an endplate potential. It has been found that the distribution of the number of quanta released by an action potential is accurately described by a binomial distribution3–8. The assumption which underlies the binomial process is that n independent units (quanta) each have the same probability of success (release), p, on a single trial (stimulation). The parameters n and p can be estimated from the mean and variance of the binomially distributed variable. Although it is not clear what the physical correlates of n and p might be, it has been suggested that n may refer to the number of releasable quanta1, or to the number of release sites which can be activated on stimulation6. The changes in the apparent values of n and p which occur during synaptic processes such as facilitation6,8 and depression7, have been interpreted as providing evidence for particular mechanisms which may underly those processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fatt, P. & Katz, B. J. Physiol., Lond. 115, 320–370 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, A. R. Physiol. Rev. 46, 51–66 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, E. W. & Wernig, A. J. Physiol., Lond. 218, 757–767 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wernig, A. J Physiol., Lond. 226, 751–759 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wernig, A. J. Physiol., Lond. 226, 761–768 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zucker, R. S. J. Physiol., Lond. 229, 787–810 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Betz, W. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 206, 629–644 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett, M. R., Florin, T. & Hall, R. J. Physiol., Lond. 247, 429–446 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Castelucci, V. & Kandel, E. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 5004–5008 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, I. S., Kita, H. & Van der Kloot, W. J. Physiol., Lond. 236, 327–339 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barrent, E. F., Barrett, J. N., Martin, A. R. & Rahamimoff, R. J. Physiol., Lond. 237, 453–463 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. del Castillo, J. & Pumplin J. Physiol., Lond. 252, 491–508 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BARTON, S., COHEN, I. Are transmitter release statistics meaningful?. Nature 268, 267–268 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/268267a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/268267a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation