Skip to main content
Log in

Stereopsis in toads

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

HARKNESS'S demonstration1 that chameleons rely primarily upon accommodative cues to judge distance encouraged me to examine the mechanisms of depth vision in an amphibian (Bufo marius). Unlike chameleons which have highly mobile eyes, toads make neither convergent nor fixating eye movements, so that, except for stabilising reflexes, their eyes are almost locked in their sockets2. For simple forms of stereoscopic range finding it is an advantage to have immobile eyes because disparity measurements can be converted directly into estimates of absolute depth (Fig. 1a). One might therefore expect toads to use retinal disparity in judging the distance of their prey. Toads have the essential apparatus for stereopsis: there is a substantial binocular overlap both in front of and above the animal3, the interocular distance is relatively large, and neural pathways bring information from corresponding areas on the two retinae to the same region in both mid-brain4 and thalamic5 visual areas. My results suggest that toads do indeed make disparity measurements and should be added to the growing list of vertebrates known to achieve stereopsis (monkey6, cat7, owl8). In addition, toads have a mechanism for measuring depth within their extensive monocular field. Ingle has shown9 that frogs and toads, like chameleons, can estimate the distance of prey almost as well with one eye as with two, and the present data suggest that they do this by monitoring the accommodative state of their eyes when the prey is in optimum focus, as Ingle originally proposed10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harkness, L. Nature 267, 346–349 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grüsser, O.-J. & Grüsser-Cornehls, U. in Frog Neurobiology (eds R. Llinas & W. Precht) (Springer, Berlin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fite, K. V. Behav. Biol. 9, 707–718 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaze, R. M. & Jacobson, M. Q. Jl exp. Physiol. 47, 273–280 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keating, M. J. & Kennard, C. J. Physiol., Lond. 258, 69–70P (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bough, E. Nature 225 42–44 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox, R. & Blake, R. R. Nature 253, 55–56 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pettigrew, J. D. & Konishi, M. Science 193, 675–678 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ingle, D. in The Amphibian Visual System (ed. K. V. Fite) (Academic, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ingle, D. Brain Behav. Evol. 1, 500–518 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COLLETT, T. Stereopsis in toads. Nature 267, 349–351 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/267349a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/267349a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation