Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial deciliation causes loss of calcium-dependent responses in Paramecium

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

WHEN a paramecium collides with an obstacle, it reverses the direction of the effective stroke of its cilia, swims backwards for a while, and, with one or more repetitions of this ‘ciliary reversal’ response, avoids the obstacle1. When the medium is disturbed2 or when the posterior part of its body is stimulated mechanically, it swims faster than usual and escapes from the stimulus mainly by increasing the frequency of ciliary beat. The current view of the underlying mechanisms can be summarised as follows3,4. A mechanical stimulus to the anterior end of the animal deforms the cell membrane of this region, increasing the permeability to Ca2+ and causing a depolarisation which further activates the Ca2+-channels in the membrane. Thus, the depolarisation develops regeneratively towards the equilibrium potential of Ca2+. The Ca2+ which has entered the cell acts on some mechanism controlling the direction of ciliary beat to bring about ciliary reversal. On the other hand, a stimulus to the posterior end activates the K+-channels in the membrane, causing hyperpolarisation and an increase in ciliary beat frequency. Although the animal behaves as a mechanoreceptor cell in the early stages of these events, it is not clear which part of the cell transduces the mechanical stimulus to the activation of Ca2+- or K+-channels. We report here the effect of removal of cilia on the electro-physiological responses of paramecium to mechanical as well as some other stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jennings, H. S., Behavior of the Lower Organisms, 47–54 (Columbia University Press, New York, 1906).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rose, W. Z., Tierpsvchol, 21, 257–278 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eckert, R., Science, 176, 473–481 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Naitoh, Y., Am. Zool., 14, 883–893 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuźnicki, L., Acta Protozool., 1, 177–185 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naitoh, Y., and Eckert, R., in Experiments in Physiology and Biochemistry. 5 (edit. by Kerkut, G. A.), 17–31 (Academic, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eckert, R., and Naitoh, Y., J. Protozool., 19, 237–243 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunlap, K., Am. Zool., 16, 185 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dunlap, K., and Eckert, R., J. Cell Biol, 70, 245a (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Naitoh, Y., and Eckert, R., Z. vergl. Physiol. . 61, 453–472 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Plattner, H., J. Cell Sci., 18, 257–269 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher, G., Kaneshiro, E. S., and Peters, P. D., J. Cell Biol, 69, 429–442 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuchiya, T., and Takahashi, K., J. Protozool. (in the press).

  14. Kennedy, J. R. Jr, and Brittingham, E., J. Ultraxtruct. Res., 22, 530–545 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

OGURA, A., TAKAHASHI, K. Artificial deciliation causes loss of calcium-dependent responses in Paramecium. Nature 264, 170–172 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264170a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264170a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation