Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Plutonium isotope ratios in polychaete worms

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

WE have noted with interest recent reports which suggest a preferential biological availability of 238Pu over 239+240Pu in terrestrial and aquatic organisms1–4. Although kinetic isotope effects do occur in biological systems for low mass number elements (H, C, N), such effects are generally discounted as the mass number of the element increases. Thus, differential biological availability of isotopes of high mass number elements, such as plutonium, would normally be attributed to differences in the chemical or physical forms of the isotopes or to the different weights of isotope available to organisms as a result of large differences in their specific activities. These arguments have indeed been used to explain differential plutonium isotope behaviour in animals in controlled laboratory conditions5–7. It is not certain, however, that the same arguments can be used to explain anomalies of plutonium isotope behaviour in organisms contaminated by nuclear test debris or by wastes from nuclear fuel reprocessing plants. Plutonium activity levels, while easily measurable, do not approach those generally used in laboratory studies. In addition, geochemical weathering could conceivably alter any original differences in physical or chemical form of the plutonium. We report here the results of experiments which show that deposit-feeding marine worms living in sediments contaminated with plutonium isotopes in different ways do not preferentially accumulate 238Pu over 239+240Pu. This is particularly significant in that the worms held in sediments contaminated in the natural environment may have been exposed to different chemical and physical forms of plutonium isotopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Volchok, H. L., et al., in Assessing Potential Ocean Pollutants, 27–63 (National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hakonson, T. E., and Johnson, L. J., LA-UR-73-1291, 1–6 (Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1973).

  3. Emery, R. M., Klopher, D. C., and Weimer, W. C., BNWL-1867, UC-48, 1–76 (Battelle Pacific North-west Laboratory, 1974).

  4. Emery, R. M., and Garland, T. R., BNWL-1879, UC-48, 1–26 (Battelle Pacific North-west Laboratory, 1974).

  5. Thompson, R. C., in Plutonium Handbook: A Guide to the Technology (edit. by Wick, O. J.), 785–829 (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mahlum, D. D., and Sikov, M. R., Hlth Phys., 17, 346–347 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bair, W. J., Willard, D. H., Nelson, I. C., and Case, A. C., Hlth Phys., 27, 392–396 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Noshkin, V. E., Bowen, V. T., Wong, K. M., and Burke, J. C., in Proc. third natn. Symp. Radioecol, CONF-710501-P2, 681–688 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beasley, T. M., and Fowler, S. W., in Acct int. Lab. mar. Radoiact. Tech. Rep., Monaco (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BEASLEY, T., FOWLER, S. Plutonium isotope ratios in polychaete worms. Nature 262, 813–814 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262813a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262813a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation