Skip to main content
Log in

Watering converts a CAM plant to daytime CO2 uptake

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THREE different photosynthetic options have been identified in plants1,2: (1) most plants have the reductive pentose phosphate or C3 pathway, where CO2 is incorporated into ribulose-1,5-diphosphate (RuDP) to yield two molecules of 3-phosphoglyceric acid, a three-carbon compound; (2) the C4 mode, where the first photosynthetic products are four-carbon dicarboxylic acids like oxaloacetate and malate formed following CO2 incorporation into phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP); and (3) crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), found in many succulent plants growing in arid regions. In the last, stomatal opening and net CO2 uptake occur at night, CO2 being incorporated by way of PEP carboxylase into organic acids. The tissue acidity decreases as the organic acids are decarboxylated during the day, when the internally released CO2 is prevented from leaving by the closed stomata. The water vapour concentration difference between the tissue and ambient air is less at night, and thus the night-time stomatal opening of CAM plants leads to overall water conservation. For example, the water lost per CO2 fixed averages about sixfold higher for C4 plants and tenfold higher for C3 ones than for CAM plants in natural conditions2. The net daily CO2 uptake by CAM plants is less than for C3 or C4 plants, so CAM plants tend to be relatively slow growing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black, C. C., A. Rev. Pl. Physiol., 24, 253–286 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Szarek, S. R., and Ting, I. P., in Environmental and Biological Control of Photosynthesis (edit. by Marcelle, R.), 289–297 (W. Junk, The Hague, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Munz, P. A., A Flora of Southern California, 864 (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koller, D., U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Report TID-4500 (UCLA 12-797), 1–28 (1970).

  5. Mork, H. M., Farmer, R. W., and Flygare, K. A., Soil Sci., 114, 61–68 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neales, T. F., Aust. J. biol. Sci., 26, 705–714 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szarek, S. R., and Ting, I. P., Pl. Physiol, Baltimore, 54, 76–81 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallace, A., Hale, V. Q., Kleinkopf, G. E., and Huffaker, R. C., Ecology, 52 1093–1095 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Downton, W. J. S., and Tregunna, E. B., Can. J. Bot., 46, 207–215 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kluge, M., and Fisher, K., Planta, 77, 212–223 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neales, T. F., Patterson, A. A., and Hartney, V. J., Nature, 219, 469–472 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartholomew, B., Photosynthetica, 7, 114–120 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osmond, C. B., et al., Nature, 246, 41–42 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HARTSOCK, T., NOBEL, P. Watering converts a CAM plant to daytime CO2 uptake. Nature 262, 574–576 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262574b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262574b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation