Skip to main content
Log in

Drugs that disrupt microtubuli do not inhibit lymphocyte activation

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

LYMPHOCYTE activation by lectins is initiated by the binding of the lectin to a cell surface receptor. It is not known, however, how this event occurring on the cell membrane is converted into a signal that is transmitted to the cell interior. Edelman and coworkers1–4 have advanced the hypothesis that lectin receptor sites may be attached to a submembranous microtubular system in a reversible way. This attachment could then determine the receptor mobility in the plane of the membrane and could also constitute a system for transmembrane signal transmission. The hypothesis is based, to a large extent, on the releasing effect that microtubule-disrupting drugs have on the inhibition of surface immunoglobulin cap formation in mouse B lymphocytes by concanavalin A (con A)2,3. Furthermore, evidence has been presented that colchicine delayed and suppressed the appearance of con A-induced blast cells in human lymphocyte cultures, that there is a delay in the onset of DNA synthesis in cultures containing colchicine and that drug sensitivity decreases with increasing culture time in the presence of con A4. Cap formation of surface immunoglobulin (Ig) is a phenomenon restricted to Ig-bearing B lymphocytes and these cells are not activated by con A. It is felt therefore that observations on this population do not bear directly on the relationship between the con A receptors and microtubuli as a signal-transducing mechanism. The other observations are suggestive but not conclusive for such a role of the microtubular system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cunningham, B. A., Wang, J. L., Gunther, G. R., Reeke, G. N., and Becker, J. W., in Cellular Selection and Regulation in the Immune Response (edit. by Edelman G. M.), 177–197 (Raven, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edelman, G. M., Yahara, I., and Wang, J. L., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 1442–1446 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yahara, I., and Edelman, G. M., Expl Cell Res., 91, 125–142 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, J. L., Gunther, G. R., and Edelman, G. M., J. Cell. Biol., 66, 128–144 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kay, J. E., Levanthal, B. G., and Cooper, H. L., Expl Cell Res., 54 94–100 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pogo, B. G. T., Cell Immun., 14, 134–138 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, L., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 253, 213–230 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart, C. C., and Ingram, M., Blood, 29, 628–639 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BETEL, I., MARTIJNSE, J. Drugs that disrupt microtubuli do not inhibit lymphocyte activation. Nature 261, 318–319 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/261318a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/261318a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation