Skip to main content
Log in

Do children draw men with arms coming out of the head?

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

CHILDREN'S drawings raise formidable taxonomic problems. Consider the two extremely common drawings in Fig. 1. There are good reasons for selecting me ‘conventional man’ as a standard against which to assess the ‘tadpole man’ but we do not know how to do it. It may be that the tadpole man is lacking a trunk1–4 or that it has the trunk amalgamated with the head4,5 (and at least two other descriptions are also plausible). In practice, authors have tended to opt for the following subset of possible hypotheses: (1) the trunk is omitted and the arms attached according to a rule ‘attach arms to head’; (2) the trunk is omitted and the arms drawn on the head by default even though the child has a rule specifying the trunk as a locus of insertion for limbs; (3) the trunk is not differentiated from the head, and therefore the rule ‘attach arms to trunk’ is not violated. The present experiment was designed to test the plausibility of such accounts. Children were given incomplete figures and asked to draw limbs. The results show that the tendency to attach arms to the head or the trunk can be brought under lawful control in such a way as to discriminate against the above hypotheses in favour of one based on the concept of a ‘production error’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowenfeld, V., and Brittain, W. L., Creative and Mental Growth (Macmillan, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dileo, J. H., Young Children and their Drawings (Brunner, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Machover, K., Personality Projection in the Drawing of the Human Figure (Thomas, Springfield, 1949).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Luquet, G. H., J. Psychol. norm. Path., 17, 684–710 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnheim, L., Art and Visual Perception (Faber, London, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marasciulo, L. A., and McSweeney, M., Psych. Bull., 67, 401–412 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodenough, F. L., Measurement of Intelligence by Drawing (Harcourt, New York, 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Snyder, R. T., and Gaston, D. S., J. clin. Psychol., 26, 377–383 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurlock, E. B., and Thompson, J. L., Child Dev., 5, 127–138 (1934).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ames, L. B., and Ilg, F. L., Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 68, 247–307 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro, T., and Stine, J., Psychoanal. Study Child., 20, 298–309 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kellogg, R., Analysing Children's Art (National, Palo Alto, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodnow, J. J., and Friedman, S., Devl Psychol., 7, 10–16 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly, K., and Elliott, J., in Ethological Studies of Child Behaviour (edit. by Blurton-Jones, N.), 329–383 (Cambridge University Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gesell, A., and Ames, L. B., J. genet. Psychol., 68, 45–61 (1946).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman, N. H., Perception, 1, 123–140 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FREEMAN, N. Do children draw men with arms coming out of the head?. Nature 254, 416–417 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/254416a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/254416a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation